摘要
目的探讨不同途径补铁治疗缺铁性贫血的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2011年12月至2012年8月治疗的140例缺铁性贫血患者的临床资料。根据补铁途径将其分成两组,即滴注组和口服组,每组各70例,分别采用静脉滴注和口服的方式补铁,对比分析两组患者的疗效。结果治疗后滴注组和口服组的总有效率分别为100%、80.00%,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论静脉注射的补铁效果显著优于口服,且不良反应和并发症发生率较低,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of different way in treating iron deficiency anemia.Methods The clinical data of 140 patients with iron deficiency anemia from December 2011 to August 2012 were reviewed.The 140 patients were divided into the infusion group（70 cases） and oral group（70 cases） by different way in treatting iron deficiency anemia.Compared the efficacy of the two groups.Results After treatment,the total efficiency of infusion group（100%） was significantly higher than that of oral group（80.00%）,P0.05.Conclusion The effect of intravenous injection of iron supplementation was significantly superior to oral,and has low incidence of adverse reactions and complications,so it is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《临床医学》
CAS
2013年第3期30-31,共2页
Clinical Medicine
关键词
补铁途径
缺铁性贫血
临床疗效
Way of iron supplementation
Iron deficiency anemia
Clinical efficacy
