期刊文献+

氯胺酮降低咪达唑仑诱导急诊危重患者气管插管对血压的影响 被引量:6

Ketamine Reduces the Influence of Midazolam-induced Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients on Blood Pressure
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究氯胺酮能否降低咪达唑仑诱导急诊危重患者气管插管对血压的影响。方法将2010年6月-2011年12月收治的56例急诊危重呼吸衰竭成年患者,随机分成咪达唑仑+芬太尼(MF)组和咪达唑仑+氯胺酮(MK)组,气管插管前咪达唑仑0.05 mg/kg静脉注入,然后MF组芬太尼2μg/kg静脉注入,MK组氯胺酮0.5 mg/kg静脉注入,待患者达镇静状态后实施气管插管。记录用药前和插管后10 min的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)的变化,观察低血压的发生情况。结果实施药物诱导气管插管后血压下降以MF组更明显(P<0.01)。低血压发生率MF组为51.7%,MK组为18.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.715,P=0.01)。结论急诊危重患者气管插管应用氯胺酮可减少咪达唑仑所致低血压的发生率。 Objective To study whether ketamine can reduce the influence of midazolam-induced emergency intubation in critically ill patients on blood pressure. Methods In this randomized, controlled, and single-blind trial, 56 patients were randomly assigned by a computerized random-number generator list to receive 0.05mg/kg of midazolam+0.2 ug/kg of fentanyl (MF group, n=29) or 0.05mg/kg of midazolam + 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine (MK group, n=27) for intubation. We recorded SBP, DBP, MAP, and HR changes, and observed the occurrence of hypotension before patients took the drugs and 10 minutes after intubation. Results The blood pressure fell in MF group more significantly (P 〈 0.01) after intubation with application of drugs. The incidence of hypotension was 51.7% in MF group, and 18.5% in MK group. The two groups showed a very significant difference (3(2=6.715, P=-0.01). Conclusion Application of ketamine for emergency intubation in critically ill patients can reduce the incidence of hypotension induced by midazolam.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2013年第4期560-562,共3页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 氯胺酮 咪达唑仑 气管插管 急诊 低血压 Ketamine Midazolam Intubation Emergency Hypotension
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Reynolds SF, Heffner J. Airway management of the critically ill patient[J]. Chest, 2005, 1127(4): 1397-1412.
  • 2Li J, Murphy H, Bugas C, et al. Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 1999, 17(2): 141-143.
  • 3Jacoby J, Heller M, Nicholas J, et al. Etomidate versus midazolam for out-of-hospital intubation: a prospective, randomized trial[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2006, 47(6): 525-30.
  • 4Reynolds SF, Heffner J. Airway management of the critically ill patient: rapid-sequence intulation[J]. Chest, 2005, 127(4): 1397- 1412.
  • 5杨明全,郑刚,徐俊,曾永红,周传正.咪达唑仑急诊诱导经鼻气管插管对血压的影响[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(2):236-237. 被引量:6
  • 6杨明全,徐俊,周洁.咪达唑仑用于急诊危重患者所致低血压的相关性分析[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(9):840-842. 被引量:8
  • 7Choi YF, Wong TW, Lau CC. Midazolam is more likely to cause hypotension than etomidate in emergency department rapid sequence intubation[J]. Emerg Med J, 2004, 21(6): 700-702.
  • 8Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9686): 293-300.
  • 9戴雄伟,沈志忠,范圣登.咪唑安定对氯胺酮麻醉诱导的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2003,19(8):484-487. 被引量:32
  • 10安刚 薛富善.现代麻醉技术[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999.467-502.

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨明全,朱文庆.力月西、芬太尼预防经鼻气管插管时的心血管反应[J].四川医学,2005,26(2):189-190. 被引量:5
  • 2杨明全,郑刚,徐俊,曾永红,周传正.咪达唑仑急诊诱导经鼻气管插管对血压的影响[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(2):236-237. 被引量:6
  • 3[1]Li J,Murphy-Lavoie H,Bugas C, et al.Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis[J].Am J Emerg Med,1999,17(2):141-143.
  • 4[2]Ma OJ,Atchley RB,Brady W, et al.Intubation success rates improve for an air medical program after implementing the use of neuromuscular blocking agents[J].Am J Emerg Med,1998,16:125-127.
  • 5[3]Olsen JC,Gurr DE,Hughes M.Video analysis of emergency medicine residents performing rapid sequence intubations[J].J of Emerg Med,2000,18(4):469-472.
  • 6[4]Sakles JC,Laurin EG,Panacek EA, et al.Rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation of emergency department patients[J].J of Emerg Med,1999,17(4):611-616.
  • 7[5]Mazurek AJ,Rae B,Cote CJ,et al.Rocuronium versus succinylcholine:are they equally effective during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia[J]? Anesth Analg,1998,87:1259-1262.
  • 8[6]Magorian T,Flannery KB,Miller RD.Comparison of rocuronium,succi-nylcholine and vecuronium for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients[J].Anesthesiology, 1993,79:913-918.
  • 9[7]Higgins TL,Yared JP,Goodale DB,et al.Propofol versus midazolam for intensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting[J].Crit Care Med,1994,22:1415-1423.
  • 10[8]Lebowitz PW,Cote ME,Daniels AL,et al.Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients[J].Anesth Analg,1982,61:771-775.

共引文献68

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部