期刊文献+

SF-36健康调查量表在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科患者中的应用 被引量:2

The Application of the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire to Patients with Ear-Nose-Throat or Head-Neck Diseases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对耳鼻咽喉头颈外科疾病患者生命健康质量进行系统量化分析,探讨SF-36健康调查量表在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科患者中的应用.方法耳鼻咽喉头颈外科门诊连续就诊的173例患者填写中文版SF-36量表,计算生理功能(physical functioning,PF)、生理职能(role-physical,RP)、躯体疼痛(bodily pain,BP)、总体健康(general health,GH)、活力(vitality,VT)、社会功能(social functioning,SF)、情感职能(role-emotional,RE)、精神健康(mental health,MH)等8个维度的总体生命健康质量得分.200例健康人作为对照组.对SF-36的8个维度针对性别、年龄段、学历、职业状况、婚姻状况、诊断类别等6个因素分别进行单因素方差分析.结果患者总体的SF-36各维度得分为PF 87.6±12.9,RP 65.0±2.7,BP 75.1±15.5,GH 54.6±17.5,VT 66.9±16.3,SF 87.1±19.5,RE 62.6±42.7,MH 65.6±15.5.各维度得分与健康对照组均具有统计学差异.性别、年龄段、职业状况和婚姻状况对于耳鼻咽喉科患者SF-36得分具有显著影响.在所有8个维度上,各亚专科疾病均显著差于健康对照组.结论 SF-36健康调查量表可反映出耳鼻咽喉头颈外科患者生命健康质量所受到的影响. Objective To investigate the quality of life and health quantitatively among patients with Ear-Nose-Throat and Head-Neck(ENT-HN)diseases, and to explore the application of the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire in ENT-HT patients. Methods A total of 173 consecutive patients in ENT-HN outpatient clinic filled in the Chinese version of SF-36 scales. Eight SF-36 scores covering various aspects of life and health were calculated, including physical functioning (PF), role- physical (RP), body pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). Two hundred healthy people were enrolled as control group. One-way ANOVA were done in terms of gender, age, occupational status, educational status, marital status and disease for 8 scales. Results The SF-36 scores in each of the 8 scales for ENT-HN patients were PF 87.6±12.9, RP 65.0±2.7, BP 75.1±15.5, GH 54.6±17.5, VT 66.9±16.3, SF 87.1±19.5, RE 62.6±42.7 and MH 65.6±15.5 respectively. The SF-36 scores of ENT-HN patients in each scale were statistically lower than the control group. Gender, age, occupational status and marital status had significant effects on SF-36 scores of ENT-HN patients. In all the eight scales, there were significant differences between ENT-HN patients and control group. Conclusion SF-36 health survey scale can reflect the quality of life and health in ENT-HN patients.
出处 《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》 2013年第3期191-194,共4页 Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
关键词 SF-36健康调查量表 生命质量 MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey(SF-36) Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ware JE,Jr.,Sherbourne CD.The MOS 36-itemshort-form health survey (SF-36).I.Conceptual frameworkand item selection.Med Care,1992,30:473-483.
  • 2Perneger TV,Leplege A,Etter JF,et al.Validationof a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults.J ClinEpidemiol,1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 3McHorney CA,Ware JE,Jr.,Raczek AE.The MOS36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36):II.Psychometricand clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mentalhealth constructs.Med Care,1993,31:247-263.
  • 4McHorney CA,Ware JE,Jr.,Lu JF,et al.The MOS36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36):III.Tests ofdata quality,scaling assumptions,and reliability across diversepatient groups.Med Care,1994,32:40-66.
  • 5van Tulder MW,Aaronson NK,Bruning PF.Thequality of life of long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease.Ann Oncol,1994,5:153-158.
  • 6Freeman JA,Hobart JC,Langdon DW,et al.Clinicalappropriateness:a key factor in outcome measure selection:the36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis.J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry,2000,68:150-156.
  • 7Thommasen HV,Berkowitz J,Thommasen AT,etal.Understanding relationships between diabetes mellitus andhealth-related quality of life in a rural community.RuralRemote Health,2005,5:441.
  • 8Yamada A,Kato M,Suzuki M,et al.Quality oflife of parents raising children with pervasive developmentaldisorders.BMC Psychiatry,2012,12:119.doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-119.
  • 9李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2342
  • 10骆云珍,钱林荣,周详,蒋志毅,李海同,杨雪明.突发性聋患者生活质量状况调查[J].中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2011,11(6):370-372. 被引量:12

二级参考文献28

  • 1刘肇瑞,黄悦勤,党卫民,刘棉,李淑然.SARS流行期间北京三所高校学生心理状况影响因素分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(7):594-597. 被引量:16
  • 2突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2005年,济南)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(8):569-569. 被引量:864
  • 3于普林,吴雅凤,赵兵利,郑国珍,宋晓光,张培兰,何慧德.老年离退休职工生活质量调查分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,1996,15(6):370-371. 被引量:40
  • 4骆云珍,钱林荣,李海同,李兆基.生物-心理-社会医学模式在喉外伤治疗中的应用体会[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2007,15(2):144-144. 被引量:1
  • 5万崇华.生存质量研究概况[M]//方积乾.生存质量测定方法及应用.北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000:1-24.
  • 6Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for bio- medicine[J]. Science, 1977,196(4286) :129-136.
  • 7Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL) [ J ]. Qual Life Res, 1993,2 (2) : 153-159.
  • 8Mosges R, Koberlein J, Erdtracht B, et al. Quality of life in patients with idiopathic sudden hear/rig loss : comparison of different therapies using the Medical Outcome Short Form (36) Health Survey question- naire [ J ]. Otol Neurotol, 2008, 29 (6) :769-775.
  • 9Carlsson PI, Hall M, Lind KJ, et al. Quality of life, psychosoeial consequences, and audiological rehabilitation after sudden sensori- neural hearing loss[J]. Int J Audiol, 2011, 50(2) :139-144.
  • 10Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.

共引文献2715

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部