摘要
包容性实证主义者对法律效力判准的最终规则——承认规则的法律效力持一种"习惯论"观点,认为承认规则自身没有法律效力问题。作为一种社会事实,承认规则以该社会法律实践中人们的实际接受为基础。"习惯论"包括"弱习惯论"和"强习惯论"两类:"弱习惯论"将作为法律效力判准的承认规则解释为"习惯"这样一种社会事实,该观点进一步补充了哈特的社会事实论;"强习惯论"将承认规则解释为一种施加义务的规则,这种"习惯"使得承认规则自身具有了"约束力"。
The inclusive legal positivists hold the ＂convention＂ thesis on the final rule ot legal validity criteria,regarding that the rule itself has no legal validity but is based on people＇s actual acceptance in social law practice as a social fact. Convention thesis includes two types ： ＂the weak conventionality thesis＂ and ＂the strong conventionality thesis＂. ＂The weak conventionality thesis＂ explains the rule of legal validity criteria into ＂convention＂ as a social fact,which further complements the social fact thesis of Hart;＂the strong conventionality thesis＂ explains the rule of recognition into a compulsory rule, which makes the rule of recognition have ＂force of constraint＂.
出处
《石河子大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2013年第2期67-73,共7页
Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
包容性实证主义法学
承认规则
强习惯论
弱习惯论
inclusive legal positivism
the rule of recognition
conventionality thesis the strong conventionality thesis
the weak
