期刊文献+

动力髋螺钉、股骨近端锁定加压钢板以及防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折90例临床分析 被引量:24

Dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture of 90 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨动力髋螺钉、股骨近端锁定加压钢板以及防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的效果。方法2010年9月至2012年3月我院收治的90例老年股骨转子间骨折患者,分别经动力髋螺钉(动力髋螺钉组30例)、股骨近端锁定加压钢板(股骨近端锁定加压钢板组30例)和防旋股骨近端髓内钉(防旋股骨近端髓内钉组30例)治疗。对3组的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折临床愈合时间、术后并发症和髋关节功能评分,以及术后并发症等方面进行比较。结果动力髋螺钉组、股骨近端锁定加压钢板组和防旋股骨近端髓内钉组的术中出血量[(287.1±72.0)、(214.9±65.8)、(85.0±33.6)ml]比较差异有统计学意义(F=88.7,P〈0.05)。3组手术时间[(1.51±0.07)、(1.49±0.04)、(0.70±0.10)h]比较,差异有统计学意义(F=445.8,P〈0.05)。3组骨折愈合时间[(15.2±1.7)、(17.0±1.4)、(15.9±1.8)周]比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.4,P〉0.05)。防旋股骨近端髓内钉组术后髋关节Sander’s评分优良率为96.7%,优于其余两组(87.5%、96.8%),差异有统计学意义(x2=39.06,P〈0.05)。3组的术后肢体短缩值分别为(1.00±0.36)、(0.80±0.12)、(0.60±0.19)cm,差异有统计学意义(F=30.4,P〈0.05),防旋股骨近端髓内钉组优于其他两组。结论防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折比其他内固定方式具有微创化、失血量少等优点,有利于患者度过围手术期。 Objective To compare the treatment effects of senile intertrochanteric fracture with the dynamic hip screw( DHS), proximal femur locking compression plate ( LCP ), anti-spin femur proximal femoral nail (PFNA). Methods Ninety cases of femoral rotor fracture patients were treat in our hospital from September 2010 to March 2012 by DHS ( n = 30), LCP ( n = 30 ) and PFNA ( n = 30 ) treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. We compared the surgical time, blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and hip function scores. Results In DHS, LCP and PFNA group, the blood loss ( (287.1 ± 72.0 ) ml, ( 214. 9 ± 65.8 ) ml, ( 85.0 ±33.6) ml, F = 88.7,P 〈 0. 05 ), the operative time ( ( 1.51 ± 0.07) h, ( 1.49± 0. 04) h, (0. 70± 0. 10) h, F = 445.8, P 〈 0. 05 ) , and both were significant difference. But the fracture healing time ( ( 15.2± 1.7) weeks, (17.0 ± 1.4) weeks, (15.9± 1.8) weeks, F = 1.4, P 〉 0.05),there was no significant difference. The PFNA group had a good hip Sander' score of 96. 7% , better than other two groups ( 87. 5%, 96. 8% ) (X2 =39. 06,P 〈0.05). The weight-bearing time of PFNA group is earlier than the other two groups ((1.00±0.36) cm,(0.80 ±0. 12) cm,(0.60 ±0. 19) cm,F= 30.4,P〈0.05). Conclusion PFNA in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture has advantages in minimally invasive, less blood loss, and help patients go through the perioperative period.
出处 《中国综合临床》 2013年第6期622-625,共4页 Clinical Medicine of China
关键词 动力髋螺钉 股骨近端锁定加压钢板 防旋股骨近端髓内钉 股骨转子间骨折 Dynamic hip screw Proximal femoral locking compression plate Anti-rotation intramedullary nail of proximal femur Intertrochanteric fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1陈孝平.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:623.
  • 2程刚,刘耀明,贺云飞,石鹏飞.LCP、DHS和PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折临床研究[J].海南医学,2012,23(3):44-47. 被引量:81
  • 3黄公怡,文良元.转子间骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(10):637-640. 被引量:167
  • 4Buciuto R, Hammer IL RAB-plate versus sliding hip screw for unstable trochanteric hip fractures: stability of the fixation and modes of failure-radiographic analysis of 218 fractures [J]. J Trauma, 2001,50 ( 3 ) :545-550.
  • 5朱敬珍,王美霞,张梅,陈绍春,高琳.防旋型股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折[J].中国基层医药,2012,19(1):70-71. 被引量:7
  • 6Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, et al. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) : a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures [ J]. Injury ,2009, 40(4) :428-432.
  • 7方基石,邓红平,林格生.防旋型股骨近端髓内钉治疗不稳定股骨转子间骨折[J].中国基层医药,2012,19(12):1884-1885. 被引量:1
  • 8Menezes DF, Gamulin A, Noesberger B. Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fractures [ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2005 ,439 :221-227.
  • 9Kristek D, LovrieI, Kristek J, et al. The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures [ J ]. Coil Antropol,2010,34 (3) :937-940.

二级参考文献32

共引文献259

同被引文献199

引证文献24

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部