摘要
目的对比分析硝苯地平缓释片与苯磺酸氨氯地平片治疗原发性高血压的临床疗效。方法将120例原发性高血压患者随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组给予苯磺酸氨氯地平片,对照组给予硝苯地平缓释片,定期测量记录患者的血压。结果观察组患者总有效率为91.67%,对照组患者总有效率为86.67%,观察组在血压改善和疗效上均优于对照组,在不良反应上观察组少于对照组。结论苯磺酸氨氯地平片临床疗效好,不良反应小,药效持续时间长,更适合老年高血压患者;而硝苯地平缓释片费用相对较低,同样是一种安全有效又价廉的降压药,可以作为低收入患者的首选药物。
Objective To comparatively analyze the clinical effectiveness of nifedipine retard tablets and amlodipine besylate tablets for primary hypertension. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with primary hypertension were randomly assigned into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated by amlodipine besylate tablets, while the control group by nifedipine retard tablets. The blood pressure of patients were regularly measured and recorded. Results The total effective rate of observation group and control group was respectively 91.67% and 86.67%. The improvement of blood pressure, therapeutic effect, and adverse reaction of observation group were better or less than those of control group. Conclusion Amlodipine besylate tablets have better clinical effectiveness, less ad- verse reactions, longer duration of drug action, and are more suitable for elderly patients with hypertension; nifedipine retard tablets have relatively lower cost, are also a safe, effective and inexpensive antihypertensive, and may be used as preferred drug for low-income patients.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2013年第17期95-96,共2页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
硝苯地平缓释片
苯磺酸氨氯地平片
原发性高血压
疗效对比
Nifedipine retard tablets
Amlodipine besylate tablets
Primary hypertension
Therapeutic effect compari- son
