期刊文献+

牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果评价 被引量:20

Effect of manual cleaning and machine cleaning for dental handpiece
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果。方法将污染程度相同的牙钻手机80支随机分成两组,每组40只,一组采用全自动清洗机清洗,另一组采用手工清洗,两组均按标准流程操作,清洗后采用ATP生物荧光法检测清洗效果。结果 ATP生物荧光检测相对发光单位(RLU)平均值分别为:机械清洗组为9,手工清洗组为41,两组均低于生产厂家提供的RLU≤45的推荐值,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论机械清洗的效果优于手工清洗,建议消毒供应中心采用机械清洗法清洗牙钻手机,确保清洗质量。 Objective Comparing the dental handpiece's cleaning effect between manual cleaning and machine cleaning. Methods Eighty same contaminated dental handpieees were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, each group contains 40 pieces. The experimental group was treated by full automatic washing machine, and the control group was cleaned manually. The cleaning method was conducted according to the operations process standard, then ATP bioluminescence was used to test the cleaning results. Results Average relative light units CRLU) by ATP bioluminescence detection were as follows: Experimental group was 9, control group was 41. The two groups were less than the recommended RLU value provided by the instrument manufacturer(RLU≤45). There was signifi- cant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion The cleaning quality of the experimental group was better than that of control group. It is recommended that the central sterile supply department should clean dental handpieces by machine to ensure the cleaning effect and maintain the quality.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期369-371,共3页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 牙钻手机 清洗效果 ATP生物荧光法 dental handpiece cleaning effect ATP bioluminescence
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1戴青,邓小虹,孙正.两种清洗方式对污染牙科手机洗涤效果分析[J].北京口腔医学,2010,18(3):129-131. 被引量:3
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部.医疗机构口腔诊疗器械消毒技术操作规范[S].2005,3:16.
  • 3黄靖雄.如何保证灭菌的质量.中华医院感染学杂志,2000,10(2):88-88.
  • 4Scheid RC, Rosen S, Beck FM. Reduction of CFUs in high-speed handpiece water lines over time[J]. Clin Prev Dent, 1990, 12:2): 9-12.
  • 5Andersen HK, Fiehn NE, Larsen T. Effect of steam sterilization inside the turbine chambers of dental turbines[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999, 87(2): 184-185.
  • 6黄浩,刘葆华,詹德群.手术器械保湿处理对清洁效果的影响[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(9):1032-1033. 被引量:76
  • 7Lawson VA, Stewart JD, Masters CL. Enzymatic detergent treat- ment protocol that reduces protease-resistant prion protein load and infectivity from surgical-steel monofilaments contaminated with a human:lerived prion strain[J]. J Gen Virol, 2007, 88(10):2905- 2914.
  • 8高莹娇,郝玉全,韩雪松.不同保湿方法对口腔医疗器械清洗效果的影响[J].中国医科大学学报,2011,40(2):180-181. 被引量:5
  • 9舒香云,耿发云,李红文,周利文,姚馨蕙.三种方法洗涤口腔器械效果比较[J].护理学杂志,2007,22(14):42-43. 被引量:10
  • 10中华人民共和国卫生部.医院消毒供应中心第3部分:清洗消毒及灭菌效果监测标准[s].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2009:4.

二级参考文献26

共引文献130

同被引文献118

引证文献20

二级引证文献148

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部