期刊文献+

A "Paradox" in China's Environmental Management: An Argument From a Comparative Study on Waste Recycling Policies Between China and Japan

A "Paradox" in China's Environmental Management: An Argument From a Comparative Study on Waste Recycling Policies Between China and Japan
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 China appears to have a "paradox" in its environmental management policies. For example, China's recycling policies appear paradoxical. With its rapidly expanding economy, China is now the world's largest emitter of urban waste. Under such a situation, China is aiming to build up a recycling economy by enacting a number of related laws. Despite the development of waste recycling regulations, however, the load on the environment by continuously increasing waste has not reduced in China so far. What explains this seemingly paradoxical situation of waste recycling in China? It has been pointed out in the previous study on China's climate change policies that environment protection falls under the rubric of sustainable development in China. The question here is whether the same story can be applied to areas other than climate change in China's environmental management. This paper examines it in the area of its waste recycling policy. This paper conducts an evaluation of waste recycling regulations in China by comparing it with the experience of Japan, China's next-door advanced country. It concludes that the waste recycling regulations in China do not primarily aim at reducing the environmental load by reducing the amount of waste but rather for the main purpose of recycling and reusing resources effectively for the sake of economic development.
机构地区 Meiji University
出处 《Chinese Business Review》 2013年第6期425-434,共10页 中国经济评论(英文版)
关键词 China paradoxical environmental management recycling policy economic development sustainablesociety the environmental Kuztnets curve 废物回收 环境管理 中国 日本 悖论 循环经济 管理条例 回收处理
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Andreoni, J., & Levinson, A. (2001). The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Public Economics, 80, 269-286.
  • 2Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science, 268(5210), 520-521.
  • 3Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., & Bates, J. M. (1997). The environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 401-416.
  • 4De Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Opschoor, J. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 161-175.
  • 5Dina, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431-455.
  • 6E&E Solutions Inc.. (2005). Report on international trade of resources between Japan and China (Nicehu kokusai shigen junkan jittai ehosa houkokusho). Tokyo: Ministry of Economics and Trade and Industry.
  • 7Gao, W. J., & Gao, Y. Z. (2011). A study on the current situation and the prospect of the output of waste electrical and electronic equipment in Chinese urban areas (Chugoku toshibu ni okeru kaden haikibutsu risaikuru no genjo oyobi haikiryo no yosoku ni kansuru kenkyu). In ICSEAD (Ed.), East Asia perspective (Higashi ajia he no Shiten) (pp. 12-22).
  • 8Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353-377.
  • 9Holtz-Eakin, D., & Seldon, T. M. (1995). Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57(1), 85-101.
  • 10Institute of Developing Economies. (2007). 2006 report on waste recycling policies in Asian countries (Heisei 18 nendo ajia kakkoku ni okeru haikibutsu risaikuru seisaku jouhou teikyou jigyou houkokusho). Tokyo: Ministry of Economics and Trade and Industry.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部