期刊文献+

弥散张量成像在脑胶质瘤放疗中的应用价值 被引量:6

The Value of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the Radiotherapy for Brain Gliomas
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]利用弥散张量成像探讨脑胶质瘤放疗后的早期变化。[方法]31例诊断明确的脑胶质瘤部分切除术后患者,在放疗前后1周内分别行MRI平扫+增强+DTI检查,分析肿瘤瘤体区及剂量相关区域的FA、ADC值变化。[结果]肿瘤瘤体区放疗后FA及ADC值均升高,放疗前后差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。剂量〉60Gy时正常白质FA值放疗后升高,50~60Gy、30~40Gy、20~30Gy区域的正常白质放疗后FA值均下降,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);剂量〉60Gy、50~60Gy、40~50Gy、30~40Gy、20~30Gy区域的ADC值升高,但放疗前后的差异亦无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。[结论]放疗前、后肿瘤瘤体区FA、ADC值变化能较早提供肿瘤对放疗反应评估。 [ Purpose ] To evaluate the value of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) in the radiotherapy for gliomas. [Methods] Thirty-one patients with gliomas pathologically proved after partial surgi- cal resection underwent routine MRI contrast-enhanced scanning and DTI pre- and post-radio- therapy(pre-RT and post-RT). The regions of interest (ROI)were placed on the central tumor re- gion and normal-appearing white matter(NAWM). The FA and ADC values were calculated auto- matically from both pre-RT and post-RT image sequences. [Resultsl Compared to pre-RT,FA and ADC values increased post-RT in tumor region with significant differences (P〈0.05). Com- pared to pre-RT about NAWM,FA values inclined for dose bins 〉60Gy,inclined for dose bins of 50-60Gy, 30-40Gy,20-30Gy groups post-RT. Neither had significant differences (P〉0.05). For dose bins 〉60Gy,50~60Gy, 30~40Gy,20~30Gy groups,ADC values inclined post-RT,nei- ther had significant differences (P〉0.05). [Conclusion ] DTI can early provide important infor- mation about effect of radiotherapy.
出处 《肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2013年第8期628-631,共4页 Journal of Chinese Oncology
关键词 脑胶质瘤 弥散张量成像 放射治疗 brain gliomas diffusion-tensor imaging radiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Khayal IS, Polley MY, Jalbert L, et al. Evaluation of diffu- sion parameters as early biomarkers of disease progression in glioblastoma muhiforme[J]. Neuro Oncol,2010,12(9): 908-916.
  • 2Nakai T,Muraki S,Bagarinao E,et al. Application of inde- pendent component analysis to magnetic resonance imaging for enhancing the contrast of gray and white matter [J]. Neuroimage, 2004,21( 1 ):251-260.
  • 3Yamasaki F,Kurisu K,Satoh K,et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging [J]. Ra- diology, 2005,235(3):985-991.
  • 4Higano S,Yun X, Kumabe T,et al. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coeffi- cient in prediction of grade and prognosis[J]. Radiology,2006, 241 (3): 839-846.
  • 5洪汛宁,王德杭,陈宏,沈天真,陈星荣.星形细胞肿瘤ADC与细胞密度导航导引下的对照研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2005,11(3):147-151. 被引量:9
  • 6Tomura N,Narita K,Izumi J,et al. Diffusion changes in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after stereotactic irradiation for brain tumors: possible prediction of treatment response [J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2006,30(3):496-500.
  • 7Valk PE, Dillon WP. Radiation injury of the brain[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1991,12(1):45-62.
  • 8Schultheiss TE,Kun LE,Ang KK,et al. Radiation re- sponse of the central nervous system[J]. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys, 1995,31 (5): 1093-1112.
  • 9Kitahara S, Nakasu S, Murata K, et al. Evaluation of treat- ment-induced cerebral white matter injury by using diffu- sion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005,26(9) : 2200-2206.
  • 10Qiu D,Leung LH,Kwong DL,et al. Mapping radiation dose distribution on the fractional anisotropy map: appli- cations in the assessment of treatment-induced white mat- ter injury[J]. Neuroimage, 2006,31(1): 109-115.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusionweighted MRI with echo - planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging , 1999, 9:53 ~ 60
  • 2Standik TW, Chaskis C, Michotte A, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. Am J Neuroradiol,2001,22: 969 ~ 976
  • 3Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusionweighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. Am J Neuroradiol, 2001,22: 1081 ~ 1088
  • 4Holodny AI, Ollenschleger M. Diffusion imaging in brain tumors.Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2002, 12:107 ~ 124
  • 5Castillo M, Smith JK, Kwock L, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high - grade cerebral gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol, 2001,22: 60 ~ 64
  • 6Filippi CG, Edgar MA, Ulug AM, et al. Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion- weighted images: correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. Am J Neuroradiol, 2001, 22:65 ~ 72
  • 7Tien R, Felsberg G, Friedman H, et al. MR imaging of highgrade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion - weighted echoplanar pulse sequences. Am J Roentgenol, 1994, 162:671 ~ 677
  • 8Kim Y, Chang K, Kim H, et al. Brain abscess and necrotic or cystic brain tumor: discrimination with signal intensity on diffusion- weighted MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 171: 1487~1490
  • 9Sartor K. MR imaging of the brain: tumors. Eur Radiol , 1999, 9:1047~1054
  • 10徐庆中.星形细胞肿瘤的病理诊断和鉴别诊断[J].中华病理学杂志,2002,31(1):64-67. 被引量:14

共引文献8

同被引文献62

  • 1张辉,贺业新,苏晋生,刘起旺,杨晓棠,祁建军.磁共振弥散张量成像在脑膜瘤诊断中的应用价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(12):1806-1809. 被引量:9
  • 2张卫东,李家尧,梁碧玲.弥散张量成像对颅脑肿瘤与相邻脑白质纤维束解剖关系的评价[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2007,15(1):1-4. 被引量:20
  • 3Stupp R, Hegi ME,Mason WP,et al. Effects of radio- therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5 -- year analysis of the EORTC--NCIC trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009 , 10(5) : 459-466.
  • 4Linda Heijme,Maartje C H M Verstappen, Edwin E G W Ter Voert, et aL Tumour response prediction by diffusion--weighted MR imaging., ready for clinical use [J] Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012,83(2): 194-207.
  • 5Anastasia K. Zikou, George A. Alexioub, Paraskevi Ko- sta, et al. Diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in glioblastoma [J] . Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2012,114(6) : 607-612.
  • 6Chenevert T L, Meyer C R, Moffat B A, et al. Diffusion MRI: a new strategy for assessment of cancer thera-peutic efficacy[J]. Mol Imaging, 2002,1(4) : 336-343.
  • 7Hayes C,Padhani A R, Leach M O. Assessing changes in tunor vascular function using dynamic contrast--en- hanced magnetic resonance imaging [J ] . NMR Bi- omed, 2002,15(2) : 154- 163.
  • 8Padhani A R, Functiongal MRI for anticancer therapy assessment[J]. Eur J Cancer , 2002, 38 (16): 2116 -2127.
  • 9Nakai T, Muraki S, Bagarinao E, et al. Application of independent component analysis to magnetic resonance imaging for enhancing the contrast of gray and white matter[J]. Neuroimage, 2004,21 (1) : 251 -260.
  • 10Laprie A,Pirzkall A, Hass--Kogan DA, et al. Lonfitu- dinal multivoxel MR spectroscopy study of pediatric diffuse brainstem glioms treated with radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005 - 62(1). 20-31.

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部