期刊文献+

高血糖在危重症患儿病情发展及预后中的意义 被引量:2

Significance of Hyperglycemia in Disease Development and Prognosis in Critically Ill Children
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究高血糖在危重症患儿病情发展及预后中的意义。方法以145例危重症患儿为研究对象,以入院24 h内血糖监测的最高值为分组标准,Glu≤6.1 mmol.L-1为血糖正常组38例,6.1 mmol.L-1<Glu≤10.0 mmol.L-1为血糖轻度升高组67例,Glu>10.0 mmol.L-1为重度升高组40例,比较3组入院时的小儿危重病例评分(PCIS)和全身性感染相关性器官功能衰竭评分(SOFA)、实验室指标、ICU住院时间及死亡率。结果对比PCIS及SOFA评分,重度升高组(81.68±8.16)分、(7.14±2.84)分与轻度升高组(86.57±6.92)分、(5.95±2.68)分及正常组(86.24±6.57)分、(5.52±2.61)分比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),轻度升高组与正常组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。比较3组实验室指标(感染性指标、肝肾功能及心肌酶),重度升高组与轻度升高组及正常组各值比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),轻度升高组与正常组各值比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。对比3组ICU住院时间,重度升高组(11.7±4.9)d与轻度升高组及正常组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),轻度升高组与正常组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对比3组死亡率,重度升高组(35%)与轻度升高组及正常组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),轻度升高组与正常组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论危重患儿血糖升高与病情严重程度及预后密切相关,对其行血糖监测具有重要临床意义。 Objective To investigate the prognosis in critically ill children. Methods significance of hyperglycemia According to the maximum in disease development and blood glucose values within 24 hours after admission, 145 critically ill children were divided into three groups: normal blood glucose group (blood glucose ≤ 6.1 mmol·L-1, n=38), mild hyperglycemia group (6.1 mmol·L-1〈blood glucose ≤ 10.0 mmol· L-1, n=67), and severe hyperglycemia group (blood glucose〉 10.0 retool· L-1, n= 40). Pediatric critical illness score (PCIS) and systemic infection related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, laboratory parameters, ICU stay and mortality were compared among the three groups on admission. Results Both PCIS and SOFA scores in severe hyperglycemia group (81.68±8.16 and 7.14±2.84, respectively) were significantly higher than those in mild hyperglycemia group(86.57±6.92 and 5.95±2.68, respectively) or normal blood glucose group (86.24±6.57 and 5.52±2.61, respectively) (P〈 0.05). There were no significant differences in PCIS and SOFA scores between mild hyperglycemia group and normal blood glucose group (P〉0.05). The differences in infection indicators, liver and kid- ney function and myocardial enzymes were significant between severe hyperglycemia group and mild hyperglycemia group, as well as between severe hyperglycemia group and normal blood glucose group (P〈0.05), but not significant between mild hyperglycemia group and normal blood glucose group (P〉 0.05). The length of ICU stay in severe hyperglycemia group [(11.7±4.9) days] was significantly longer than that in mild hyperglycemia group [(6.2±3.2) days] or normal blood glucose group [(6.7±3.6) days](P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in the length of ICU stay between mild hyperglycemia group and normal blood glucose group (P〉0.05). The mortality in severe hyperglycemia group(35%) was significantly higher than that in mild hyperglycemia group (13.4%) or normal blood glucose group (10.5%) (P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in mortality between mild hyperglycemia group and normal blood glucose group (P〉0.05). Conclusion The elevated blood glucose is closely related to disease severity and prognosis. Therefore, blood glucose monitoring has important clinical significance in critically ill children.
作者 谈小云
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2013年第6期78-80,83,共4页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 危重症 高血糖 儿童 critical illness hyperglycemia children
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献41

共引文献43

同被引文献21

  • 1Kapil Dev Soni,Santosh Mahindrakar,Amit Gupta,Subodh Kumar,Sushma Sagar,Ashish Jhakal.Comparison of ISS, NISS, and RTS score as predictor of mortality in pediatric fall[J].Burns & Trauma,2017,5(3):209-214. 被引量:5
  • 2李耿,喻文亮,于学军,钱素云,孙波.小儿危重病例评分和死亡指数在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(5):518-521. 被引量:27
  • 3崔红玉,张少丹,程艳蕊,刘玉慧,崔广奇.危重评分与儿童死亡风险评分在儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的作用及其相互关系[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(18):1383-1385. 被引量:12
  • 4Pollack MM,Ruttimann UE,Getson PR. Pediatric risk of mor-tality ( PRISM) score [J]. Criti Care Med,1988,16 (11): 1110-1116.
  • 5Pollack MM,Patel KM,Ruttimann UE. PRISM III:an updatedPediatric Risk of Mortality score [ J]. Crit Care Med’ 1996,24(5):743-752.
  • 6Shann F,Pearson G, Slater A,et al. Paediatric index of mortality(PIM) : a mortality prediction model for children in intensivecare [J]. Intensive Care Med, 1997,23(2) :201-207.
  • 7Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G. PIM2;旦 revised version of thePaediatric Index of Mortality[ J]. Intensive Care Med,2003,29(2):278-285.
  • 8Martha VF,Garcia PC,Piva JP,et al. Comparison of two prog-nostic scores(PRISM and PIM) at a pediatric intensive care unit[J]. J Pediatr(Rio J) ,2005,81(3) :259-264.
  • 9Thukral A, Lodha R, Irshad M, et ai. Performance of PediatricRisk of Mortality ( PRISM ) , Pediatric Index of Mortality(PIM) ,and PIM2 in a pediatric intensive care unit in a develo-ping country[ J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med,2006,7(4) :356-361.
  • 10Qureshi AU,Ali AS,Ahmad TM. Comparison of three prognos-tic scores ( PRISM,PELOD and PIM 2) at pediatric intensivecare unit under Pakistani circumstances [ J ]. J Ayub MedicalCollege,Abbottabad :JAMC,2007,19(2) :49-53.

引证文献2

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部