期刊文献+

细胞块技术联合免疫细胞化学检测浆膜腔积液中腺癌细胞的价值 被引量:12

The clinical value of the cell blocks method and immunochemistry on adenocarcinoma cell in serous cavity effusions
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨浆膜腔积液中腺癌细胞细胞块技术联合免疫细胞化学检测的临床价值。方法选用浆膜腔积液转移性腺癌共60例,每例均制备常规细胞学涂片和细胞块,并用细胞块切片做CK7抗体、CK18抗体、癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲状腺转录因子(TTF)-1、Vimentin、Calretinin、间皮细胞抗原(MC)行免疫细胞化学染色。结果 60例浆膜腔积液标本中CK7抗体、CK18抗体、CEA对于转移性腺癌的敏感性分别为100%(60/60)、95%(57/60)和75%(45/60),特异性分别为100%(60/60)、87%(52/60)和80%(48/60)。结论浆膜腔积液细胞学中细胞块技术联合免疫细胞化学检测与传统细胞学涂片相比,明显提高了细胞学病理诊断的敏感性和准确性,使细胞学诊断上升到免疫学水平,是一种值得推广的方法。 Objective To explore the clinical value of cell block and immunochemistry on adenocarcinoma cell in serous cavity effusions. Methods Sixty cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma With serous cavity effusions Were choosed and prepared routing cell smears and cell blocks for each case. Cell blocks sections would be applied to the detection of immunocytochemical staining for the cell block sections for CKT, CK18, CEA, TrF-1, Vimentin, Calretinin and MC. Results In60 of serous cavity effusion samples, CK7, CKI8, CEA sensitivity to metastatic adenocarcinoma were 100% (60160), 95%(57/60) and 75%(45/60): The specificity were 100%(60/60), 87%(52/60) and 80%(48/60). Conclusion Compared with the conventional cytology smear in cavity effusion cytology, Cell block technique and immunocytochemical detection could improve the sensitivity and accuracy of cytological diagnosis significantly and rises to immunological level. It is a approach that is worthy spreading,
出处 《实用医技杂志》 2013年第9期933-935,共3页 Journal of Practical Medical Techniques
基金 江苏大学医学临床科技发展基金(JLY20120168)
关键词 腺癌 免疫组织化学 组织细胞学制备技术 A denocarcinoma Immunohistochemistry Histocytological preparation techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Nathan NA, Narayan E, Smith MM, et al. Cell block cytology- improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. AM J Clin Pathol, 2000, 114(4): 599-606.
  • 2Collins GR, Thomas J, Joshi N, et al. The diagnostic value of cell Mock as an adjunct to liquid-based cytology of bronchial washing specimens in the diagnosis and subclassification of pulmonary neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol, 2012, 120 (2) : 134- 141.
  • 3Khalbuss WE, Hooda S, Auger M. Cytomorphology of boer- haave's syndrome: a critical value in cytology. J Cytol, 2013, 30 (10): 8.
  • 4Thapar M, Mishra RK, Sharma A, et al. Critical analysis of cell block versus smear examination in effusion. J Cytol, 2009, 26 (2):60-64.
  • 5Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Cosimelli M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of peritoneal immunocytology in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncoi, 1998, 16: 3406-3411.
  • 6Demay RM. The art and science of cytopathology. Chicago: ASCP Press, 1996: 257-325.
  • 7Shivakunmrswamy U, Arakeri SU, Karigowdar MH, et al. Diag- nostic utility of the cell block method versus the conventional smear study in pleural fluid cytology. J Cytol, 2012, 29( 1): 11- 15.
  • 8Fetsch PA, Simsir A, Brosky K, et al. Comparison of three commonly used cytologic preparations in effusion immunocy- tochenistry. Diagn Cytopatho], 2002, 26(1 ): 61-66.
  • 9尹艳华.细胞块免疫细胞化学在确定转移腺癌原发灶中的意义[J].肿瘤防治研究,2008,35(1):47-49. 被引量:6

二级参考文献6

  • 1舒仪经,阚秀.细针针吸病理细胞学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000,10.
  • 2李天潢,黄受方.实用细针吸收细胞学[M].北京:科学出版社,2000,29.
  • 3Barb areschi M, Murer b, Colby TV, et al. CDX2 homeobox gene expression is a reliable marker of colorectal andenocarcinoma metastases to the Lung[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2003,27(3):141-149.
  • 4Saad RS, Cho P, Silverman JF, et al. Usefulness of CDX2 in separating mucinous bronchioloalveolar adcnocarcinoma of the lung from metastic musinous colorectal adenocarcinoma[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2004,122(4):421-427
  • 5张建强,周晓军,孟奎,马捷,孙桂勤,张泰和.肺硬化性血管瘤组织中甲状腺转录因子-1的表达及其组织起源的探讨[J].中华病理学杂志,2002,31(1):42-45. 被引量:45
  • 6于兰,张建兵.颈部淋巴结细针吸取细胞学诊断分析[J].交通医学,2003,17(1):86-86. 被引量:2

共引文献5

同被引文献82

  • 1郑晖,颜亚晖.介绍一种简单适用的胸腹水脱落细胞石蜡包埋法[J].中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志,2003,12(4):445-446. 被引量:10
  • 2邱前程,卢善明,黄杰雄.胸腹水细胞块石蜡包埋及免疫细胞化学染色在胸腹水细胞病理学诊断中的价值[J].汕头大学医学院学报,2005,18(1):43-44. 被引量:10
  • 3刘成玉,罗春丽.临床检验基础[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:184-188.
  • 4Van der Bij S ,Schaake E, Koffijberg H. Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review[J]. BrJ Cancer, 2011, 104(8): 1325-1333.
  • 5Dikensoy O, Celik N, Kul S. Ischemia modified albumin in the differential diagnosis ofpleural effusions[J]. Resprir Me-d, 2011, 105 (11): 1712-1717.
  • 6Rodriguez-Pineiro AM, Blanco-Prieto S, Sanchez-Otero N. On the identification of biomarkers for non-small cell lung ca-ncer in serum and pleural effusion[J]. J Proteomics, 2010, 73 (8) :1511-1522.
  • 7Zhang JX, Xie CM ,Zhu ZW. Potential role of AQP1 and VEGF in the development of malignant pleural effusion in m-ice[J]. Med Oncol, 2012 ; 29(2): 656-662.
  • 8Rashid-KolvearF, Taboski MA, Nguyen J. Troglitazone sup-presses telomerase activity independently of PPAR gamma in estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer cells[J]. BMC Cancer, 2010, 10(1): 390.
  • 9Thapar M, Mishra R K, Sharma A, et al. Critical analysis of cellblock versus smear examination in effusions[J]. J Cytol, 2009, 26(2): 60-64.
  • 10Tsai T H, Wu S G, Chang Y L, et al. Effusion immunocytochemistryas an alternative approach for the selection of first-Line targetedtherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma [J], J Thorac Oncol,2012,7(6): 993-1000.

引证文献12

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部