期刊文献+

前列腺癌盆腔各解剖区域淋巴结转移特点及其临床意义

Features of metastasis in different pelvic lymph node groups and their significance in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨前列腺癌盆腔各解剖区域淋巴结转移特点及其临床意义。方法:收集因前列腺癌而行前列腺根治切除+分区盆腔淋巴结清扫术93例患者的临床病理资料,将盆腔淋巴结分为9区5组,明确盆腔各解剖区域淋巴结转移的频率和分布,比较各组淋巴结转移率和转移度。结果:全组有25例发生淋巴结转移,转移率为26.9%(25/93)。低、中、高危组前列腺癌的淋巴结转移率分别为2.6%(1/39)、30.0%(9/30)、62.5%(15/24)。各组转移率由高到低排列为髂内、闭孔、髂外、骶前和髂总,分别为16.4%(11/67),15.1%(14/93),11.8%(11/93),2.3%(1/44)和0(0/67),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。转移淋巴结(阳性)53枚,转移度为3.2%(53/1643)。各组转移度由高到低排列为闭孔、髂内、髂外、骶前和髂总分别为4.9%(23/468),4.0%(16/401),3.2%(12/378),0.9%(2/222)和0(0/174),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:①对低危组的患者可不实施盆腔淋巴结清扫;对中-高危组患者,必须实施淋巴结清扫。②清扫范围:髂外、髂内和闭孔组为必须清扫的最小区域范围;髂总和骶前组不必进行常规清扫;③可根据术中闭孔、骶前组淋巴结快速冰冻病理检查,明确有无转移,来决定盆腔淋巴结清扫最适个体化清扫范围。 Objective: To evaluate the features of metastasis in different pelvic lymph node groups and their significance in lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Method: The data of 93 prostate cancer patients with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection from January 1997 to October 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The pelvic lymph nodes were divided into 9 regions 5 groups ac cording to the common guideline. The metastatic rate and degree of dissected lymph nodes in these patients were compared. Result: Complete pathological information was available for 93 patients, of 25 patients had lymph node metastases, including 2.6% with low, 30.0% with intermediate and 62.5% with high risk cancer. The metastatic total rate and degree of dissected lymph nodes were 26.9%%0(25/93) and 3.2%(53/1 643) respectively. The metastatic rates of lymph node groups in these patients from high to low were as follows: internal lilac(16.4 % ), obtu rator( 15.1% ), external iliac ( 11. 8 % ), presacral ( 2. 3 % ) and common iliac ( 0 ), with a statistically significant difference in those groups(P〈0.01) . The metastatic degrees of the lymph node groups from high to low were as follows: obturator(4.9%), internal iliac(4.0%) ,external iliac(3.2%), presacral(0.9%) and common lilac(0), with a statistically significant difference in those groups(P〈0.01). Conclusion: It is not recommended to perform PLND for the low risk group. It is suggested that the regional lymph nodes with intermediate-risk and high risk group should be resected necessarily. It is also suggested that the minimum benchmark for radical cystectomy should include extensive pelvic lymph node dissection with anatomical boundaries including obturator, internal iliac and external iliac nodes. The operation optimal extent may be indicated according to the result of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the obturator or presacral group is negative or positive.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第9期666-669,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 根治性前列腺切除 淋巴结转移 淋巴结切除术 prostate neoplasms radical prostatectomy lymphatic metastasis lymph node excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Heidenreich A, Varga Z, von Knobloch R. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph nodes metasta sis[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(4):1681-1686.
  • 2Joslyn S A, Konety B R. Impact of extent of lymph- adenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer[J]. Urology, 2006, 68(1) :121-125.
  • 3Allaf M E, Palapatu G S, Trock B J, et al. Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 2004, 172(5 Pt 1):1840-1844.
  • 4Lindberg C, Davidsson T, Gudjonsson S, et al. Ex- fended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostale cancer: will the previously reported benefits be reproduced in hospitals with lower surgical volumes[J]? Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2009, 43(6):437-441.
  • 5Godoy G, von Bodman C, Chade D C, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency and distribution of nodal metastases in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series[J]. J Urol, 2012, 187(6) : 2082-2086.
  • 6Godoy G, Chong K T, Cronin A, et al. Extent of pel vie lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph nodeinvolvement[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60(2):195- 199.
  • 7La Rochelle J C, Amling C L. Role of lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: indications and controversies [J]. UrolClin North Am, 2011, 38(4):387-395.
  • 8李呜.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南[M].那彦群,叶章群,孙光主编.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:65.
  • 9Lee E K, Herr H W, Dickstein R J, et al. Lymph node density for patient counselling about prognosis and for designing clinical trials of adjuvant therapies after radical eystectomy[J]. BJU Int,2012,110(11 Pt B):E590-595.
  • 10Bianco F J Jr, Scardino P T, Eastham J A. Radical prostatectomy: long-term caner control and recovery of sexual and urinary function( " trifecta")[J]. Urology, 2005, 66(5 Suppl):83-87.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部