期刊文献+

肾透明细胞癌多b值DWI的单指数函数与双指数函数分析比较 被引量:8

The comparison between monoexponential and biexponential function of multi-b DWI in evaluation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较肾透明细胞癌(CCRCC)多b值DWI的单、双指数函数分析在术前分级的价值。材料与方法回顾性分析32例透明细胞癌患者的影像学资料及病理资料。根据Fuhrman核分级法分成低、高级别两组。参考常规序列,在肿瘤实质区手动勾画大小约0.30 cm×0.30 cm^0.45 cm×0.45 cm的ROI,记录各b值对应的信号强度值。采用单指数函数计算两组的参数ADC值;应用双指数函数计算两组的F、Dfast和Dslow。比较各参数在两组之间的差异,组间比较采用非参数检验;采用受试者工作特征曲线分析预测高、低级别肾透明细胞癌的效能。当P<0.05,认为有统计学意义。结果低级别组20例,高级别组12例。与低级别的CCRCC相比较,高级别组的ADC值无明显差异(U=50.0,P=0.71),F减低(U=18.0,P=0.01),但是Dfast、Dslow都增大,组间均存在统计学差异(U=15.0,P=0.01;U=20.0,P=0.02)。而且,F,Dfast和Dslow预测高、低级别CCRCC的效能相似(P值分别为0.61、0.77和0.44)。结论与多b值DWI的单指数函数分析相比,双指数函数更适合透明细胞癌术前分级的分析。 Objective: To probe the value of monoexponential and biexponential function used in multi-b DWI on the grading of the CCRCC before the surgery.Materials and Methods: The imaging and pathological data sets of 32 cases with CCRCC were assessed retrospectively.There were low grade(Group 1) and high grade(Group 2) group confirmed by Fuhrman Grading.Based on the conventional MR images,the region of interesting was plotted by a radiologist,and ranges from 0.30 cm2to 0.45 cm2in tumorous parenchyma on multi-b DWI.The signal intensity of ROI on DWI each b value were recorded.The ADC value is calculated in monoexponential function,and F,Dfast and Dslow were calculated in biexponential function.The differences of each parameter between two groups were compared with nonparametric test.The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) was performed to evaluate diagnosibility during four parameters.There is a significant difference when the P0.05.Results: 20 cases of low grade CCRCC and 12 cases of high grade were confirmed by the pathological test.There is not a significant difference(U=50.0,P=0.71) for ADC between two groups.Compared with Group 1,the F decreased in Group 2(U=18.0,P=0.01),but Dfast and Dslow increased in Group 2(U=15.0,P=0.01.U=20.0,P=0.02 respectively).F,Dfast and Dslow have the similar sensitivity and specificity in differential diagnosis between two groups(P=0.61,0.77 and 0.44 respectively).Conclusions: Compared with the monoexponential function of multi-b DWI,the biexponential function is more suitable for grading of CCRCC preoperatively.
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS CSCD 2013年第4期266-270,共5页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 江苏省常州市卫生局重大科技项目(编号:ZD201110)
关键词 腺癌 透明细胞 肾肿瘤 磁共振成像 弥散 Adenocarcinoma clear cell Kidney neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging diffusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Delahunt B, Bethwaite PB, Nacey JN. Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumours divided according to histological subtype. Pathology, 2007, 39 (5): 459-465.
  • 2孙军,邢伟,陈杰,邢士军,张丽君,张艳文,陈铜兵,曹赟杰.T1b期肾透明细胞癌ADC值与病理分级相关性的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2012,46(8):682-686. 被引量:22
  • 3Yu X, Lin M, Ouyang H, et al. Application of ADC measurement in characterization of renal cell carcinomas with different pathological types and grades by 3.0 T diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81 (11): 3061-3066.
  • 4Hoff BA, Chenevert TL, Bhojani MS, et al. Assessment of multiexponential diffusion features as MRI cancer therapy response metrics. Magn Reson Med, 2010, 64(5): 1499-1509.
  • 5Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Chandarana H, et al. Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification. Radiology, 2010, 254 (3): 783-792.
  • 6Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2007, 188(6): 1622-1635.
  • 7Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 1982, 6 (7): 655-663.
  • 8Ghavamian R, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J Urol, 2002, 168(2): 454-459.
  • 9Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001, 22 (6): 1081-1088.
  • 10Rosenkrantz AB, Niver BE, Fitzgerald EF, et al. Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195 (5): W344-351.

二级参考文献34

  • 1李涛,高元桂,高育,文载律,梁燕.肾癌假包膜征高场MRI表现特征、病理基础及意义[J].中华放射学杂志,1995,29(11):781-783. 被引量:19
  • 2董柏君 张进 陈勇辉 等.上海仁济医院肾癌数据库资料分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29:222-225.
  • 3Delahunt B, Bethwaite PB, Nacey JN. Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumors divided according to histological subtype. Pathology, 2007, 39 : 459-465.
  • 4Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusion- weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR, 2001,22 : 1081-1088.
  • 5Lam JS, Klatte T, Breda A. Staging of renal cell carcinoma:current concepts. Indian J Urol, 2009, 25: 446-454.
  • 6Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol, 2004, 171 : 1066-1070.
  • 7Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 1982, 6 : 655-663.
  • 8Ghavamian R, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney : an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J Urol, 2002, 168: 454-459.
  • 9Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhou Y, et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 73 : 162-167.
  • 10Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, et al. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 2003, 27: 612-624.

共引文献30

同被引文献176

  • 1陈东,刘剑,刘德海.我国艾滋病疫情发展趋势预测和防控措施分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2013,29(1):3-7. 被引量:58
  • 2Ming Li Jin Gu.Changing patterns of colorectal cancer in China over a period of 20 years[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(30):4685-4688. 被引量:93
  • 3史大鹏,闫庆栋,陈世华,陈晓鹏,徐俊玲.AIDS脑部病变影像学表现分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(2):143-146. 被引量:26
  • 4陈双庆,郭亮,陈剑华,谢道海,胡春洪.正常成人肾脏水分子扩散加权成像的研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(6):721-724. 被引量:16
  • 5Lezoche G, Baldarelli M, 6uerrieri M, et al. A prospective randomized study with a 5-year minimum follow-up evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy[J]. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2008, 22(2): 352-358.
  • 6Beets-Tan RG. Pretreatment MRI of lymph nodes in rectal cancer: An opinion-based review[J]. Colorectal Disease, 2013, 15(7): 781-784.
  • 7Perez RO, Pereira DD, Proscurshim I, et al. Lymph node size in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation-can we rely on radiologic nodal staging after chemoradiation[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009, 52(7): 1278-1284.
  • 8Brown G, Richards CJ, BourneMW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison[J]. Radiology, 2003, 227(2): 371-377.
  • 9Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Maretto I, et al. Prospective assessment of imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(1): 56-64.
  • 10Mizukami Y, Ueda S, Mizumoto A, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35(4): 895-899.

引证文献8

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部