期刊文献+

西北沿黄灌区不同作物间套作大豆产出效果分析 被引量:18

Quantitative Evaluation and Analysis on Different Cropping Patterns of Soybean in Northwest Irrigation Districts along Yellow River
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了客观地评价西北沿黄灌区不同作物间套作大豆的产出效果,进一步补充完善各栽培模式,应用土地当量比、产量当量、产值当量等不同量化指标对该区早熟马铃薯套作大豆、玉米间作大豆、小麦套作大豆、亚麻套作大豆及豌豆套作大豆的种植模式进行了分析,同时对5种模式的经济效益进行了评价。结果表明:与单作农田相比,早熟马铃薯套作大豆、玉米间作大豆、小麦套作大豆、亚麻套作大豆及豌豆套作大豆的种植模式土地利用效率分别提高了54%、34%、52%、52%、66%,单位面积产量分别为单作农田的1.39,1.28,1.48,1.55,1.64倍,单位面积产值分别为单作农田的1.43,1.31,1.54,1.53,1.69倍。从盈利看,依次为早熟马铃薯套作大豆、玉米套作大豆、豌豆套作大豆、小麦套作大豆及亚麻套作大豆模式,分别为20 033.48,11 786.85,11 312.02,9 941.03,9 748.05元·hm-2。 In order to quantitatively evaluate the benefits of different cropping patterns of soybean in Northwest irrigation districts along Yellow river, we adopted the concept of land equivalent ratio, yield equivalent and value of output equivalent, and analyzed the cropping patterns of early potato/soybean, wheat/soybean, corr'/soybean, oil flax/soybean and pea/soybean. Compared with monocuhure, land use efficiency of five patterns raised by 54% , 34% , 52% , 52% and 66% , unit area yield increased by 39%, 28%, 48%, 55% and 64%, unit area output value enhanced by 43%, 31%, 54%, 53% and 69%, respectively. The benefits of five cropping patterns in descending order were early potato/soybean, corn//soybean, pea/soybean, wheat/soybean and oil flax/soybean, the profit was 20 033.48, 11 786.85, 11 312.02, 9 941.03 and 9 748.05 yuan· ha - 1 , respectively.
出处 《大豆科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期614-619,共6页 Soybean Science
基金 现代农业产业技术体系专项(CARS-04)
关键词 间套作 产出效果 经济效益 大豆 Intercropping Output efficiency Economic benefits Soybean
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Jurik T W, Van K. Microenvironment of a corn-soybean-oat strip intercrops system [ J ]. Field Crops Research, 2004,90 : 335 -349.
  • 2De Bruin J L, Pedersen P. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on soybean yield [ J ]. Agronomy Journal ,2008,100:704-710.
  • 3Sudmeyer R A, Speijers J. Influence of windbreak orientation, shade and rainfall interception on wheat and lupin growth in the absence of below-ground competition [ J ]. Agroforestry Systems, 2007, 71: 201-214.
  • 4Peng X B, Zhang Y Y, Cai J, et al. Photosynthesis, growth and yield of soybean and maize in a tree-based agroforestry intercropping sys- tem on the Loess Plateau [ J ]. Agroforestry Systems, 2009,76: 569-577.
  • 5常汝镇,邱丽娟,李向华.我国大豆的生产和创新研究[J].中国农学通报,2001,17(3):91-93. 被引量:18
  • 6常汝镇,王连铮.大豆研究50年[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2010:32-35.
  • 7Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen E S. Interspecific competi- tion, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping [ J ]. Field Crops Research ,2001,70 : 101-109.
  • 8Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency [ J ]. Plant and Soil, 2003,248 : 305 -312.
  • 9Ainsworth E A, Yendrek C R, Skoneczka J A, et al. Accelerating yield potential in soybean : potential targets for biotechnological im- provement[ J ]. Plant, Cell & Environment ,2012,35:38-52.
  • 10Kamruzzaman M, Hasanuzzama M. Factors affecting profitability of sugarcane production as monocuhure and as intercrop in selected areas of Bangladesh [ J]. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Re- search,2007,32:433-444.

共引文献29

同被引文献228

引证文献18

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部