期刊文献+

晚期结直肠癌化疗的临床观察 被引量:3

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较XELOX(卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案)与FOIFOX 4(奥沙利铂+5-Fu+亚叶酸钙)方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的近期疗效及安全性。方法:将46例晚期结直肠癌病人按治疗方案随机分为XELOX组25例和FOLFOX 4组21例,比较2组的近期疗效及不良反应。结果:XELOX组有效率和疾病进展时间( TTP)分别为44%和6.27mo,与FOLFOX 4组相似(47.6%和5.80mo),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);XELOX组恶心呕吐发生率为16%,显著低于FOIFOX 4组的47.6%(P〈0.05);XELOX组手足综合征发生率为52%明显高于FOLFOX 4组的14.3%(P〈0.05),但程度较轻,主要为玉~域度。结论:XELOX方案与FOLFOX 4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌疗效确切,两组近期疗效相似,不良反应XELOX组更低。
出处 《内蒙古医科大学学报》 2013年第5期396-398,共3页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献63

共引文献63

同被引文献47

  • 1秦叔逵,张永杰,王杰军.晚期结直肠癌的药物治疗进展[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(9):48-52. 被引量:1
  • 2周东风,李现红,李杨.结直肠癌的姑息性治疗[J].临床普外科电子杂志,2013,1(1):52-56. 被引量:6
  • 3Reyhan Akhtar,Shammy Chandel,Pooja Sarotra,Bikash Medhi.Current status of pharmacological treatment of colorectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2014,6(6):177-183. 被引量:5
  • 4张茹霞,陶敏,段卫明,王振欣,王蓉.XELOX与FOLFOX4方案一线治疗晚期结直肠癌的近期疗效及毒副反应比较[J].苏州大学学报(医学版),2006,26(6):1011-1012. 被引量:6
  • 5Alonso - Espinaco V,Cuatrecasas M,Alonso V,et al. RAClb overex-pression correlates with poor prognosis in KRAS/BRAF WT metastaticcolorectal cancer patients treated with first - line FOLFOX/XELOXchemotherapy [ J]. Eur J Cancer, 2014 ,85(4) :867 - 893.
  • 6Grande C, Quintero G, Candamio S, et al. Biweekly XELOX (capecit-abine and oxaliplatin) as first - line treatment in elderly patients with me-tastatic colorectal cancer [ J]. J Geriatr Oncol,2013,24(8) : 114 - 121.
  • 7Fr6d6rique Rousseau, Roland Bugat, Michel Ducreux, et al. Effect ofXELOX on functional ability among elderly patients with metastatic colo-rectal cancer: Results from the FNCLCC/GERICO 02 phase II study[J]. J Geriatr Oncol, 2011,22(8):105 -111.
  • 8Cremolini C,Loupakis F,Antoniotti C,et al.FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer:updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open- label,phase 3 TRIBE study[J].Lancet Oncol,2015,16(13):1306-1315.
  • 9Lin JK,Tan EC,Yang MC.Comparing the effectiveness of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy for elderly Taiwan Residents stage III colorectal cancer patients based on quality-of-life measures(QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38)and a new cost assessment tool[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2015,13(1):61.
  • 10Miwa M,Ura M,Nishida M,et al.Design of anoveloral fluo-ropyrimi dinecar bamate,capecitabine,which generates 5 fluo-rouracil selectively in tumors byenzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue[J].Eur J Cancer,2008,9(22):1026-1027.

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部