期刊文献+

基于WPT的建筑废弃物管理费用研究——以珠三角地区为例 被引量:2

Research on the Management Expense of C&D Waste Based on WTP ——The Pearl River Delta Perspective
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以珠三角地区注册的承包商为列,根据承包商的整体特征,调查研究承包商支付建筑废弃物管理费用的意愿,影响其支付意愿的决定因素,建立了一个基于支付意愿法的建筑废弃物管理费用多元回归模型。研究结果显示:国营企业的承包商比私营企业的承包商更愿意支付管理费;承包商的建设项目经验越丰富,建筑废弃物管理费反而支付得越少;承包商的规模越大,注册资金越多,废弃物管理费支付得越多。研究成果可以进一步完善我国建筑废弃物管理理论,为政府制定建筑废弃物管理经济补偿相关法律、政策提供理论依据。 Illustrated by the case of those registered contractors in the Pearl River Delta, according to the overall characteristics of the contractors, the willingness of the contractors to pay for the C&D waste and the determinants of the willingness have been investigated. Then a multiple regression model which is based on WTP (Willingness-To-Pay) has been built. The results show that: state-owned enterprises contractors are more willing to pay for management expenses than private contractors; the more construction project experience the contractors has, the less management expenses of C&D waste they pay for~ the larger scale and more registered capital the contractors has, the more management expensess of C&D waste they pay for. These results can improve the national construction waste management theory, and provide a theoretical basis for the formulation of C&D waste's economic compensation laws and policies.
出处 《工程管理学报》 2013年第6期46-50,共5页 Journal of Engineering Management
基金 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主研究课题(x2tjC7100870)
关键词 建筑废弃物 管理费用 支付意愿法 珠三角地区 C&D waste management costs WTP Pearl River Delta Region
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1邹彦,姜志德.农户生活垃圾集中处理支付意愿的影响因素分析——以河南省淅川县为例[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010,10(4):27-31. 被引量:32
  • 2徐大伟,常亮,侯铁珊,赵云峰.基于WTP和WTA的流域生态补偿标准测算——以辽河为例[J].资源科学,2012,34(7):1354-1361. 被引量:80
  • 3Rahji,M. A. Y.,Oloruntoba, Elizabeth O. Determinantsof households willingness-to-pay for private solid wastemanagement services in Ibadan , Nigeria[J]. WasteManagement and Research, 2009,27 ( 10): 961-965.
  • 4Aadland, D. , Caplan, A. J.,2003. Willingness to payfor curbside recycling with detection and mitigation ofhypothetical bias[J]. American Journal of AgriculturalEconomics,2003, 85 (2): 492-502.
  • 5N. Jones, K. Evangelinos, C. P. Halvadakis,T. Iosifides,C. M. Sophoulis. Social factors influencing perceptionsand willingness to pay for a market-based policy aiming onsolid waste managementfJ]. Resources,Conservation andRecycling, 2010, 54: 533-540.
  • 6Danso,G. Drechsel,P.,Fialor,S . , Giordano,M. Estimating the demand for municipal waste compostvia farmers5 willingness-to-pay in Ghana[J]. WastManagement, 2006.
  • 7Kotchen, M. J. Environmental attitudes,motivation,and contingent valuation of non-use values : a case studyinvolving endangered species[J]_ Ecological Economics,2000, 23: 93-107.
  • 8广州市人大常委会.广州市建筑废弃物管理条例[S]. 2012.
  • 9Rawshan Ara Begum, Chamhuri Siwar, Joy JacquelinePereira, Abdul Hamid Jaafar. Factors and values ofwillingness to pay for improved construction wastemanagement-A perspective of Malaysian contractors[J].Waste Management, 2007 (27): 1902-1909.
  • 10http: //www.gdcic.net/GdcicIms/front/Message/gov.html[EB/OL],广东省住房与城乡建设厅.

二级参考文献38

  • 1刘亚萍.运用CVM对生态保护经济价值的评价——在武陵源国家自然保护区中的应用分析[J].绿色中国(理论版),2004(11M):34-37. 被引量:5
  • 2叶春辉.农村垃圾处理服务供给的决定因素分析[J].农业技术经济,2007(3):10-16. 被引量:34
  • 3DUBIN JEFFREY A. PETER NAVARRO. How markets for impure public goods organize the case of household refuse collection[J]. Jounal of Law, Economics & Organization, 1988,4 (2) : 217-- 241.
  • 4Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L.. Measuring the economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000,(33):103-117.
  • 5Amigues J.P., Boulatoff C., Desigues B.. The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: A willingness to accept/willingness to pay using contingent valuation approach[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43(1):17-31.
  • 6Bienabe E, Heame R R. Public preferences for biodiversity conser-vation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006,(9):335-348.
  • 7Moran D, McVittie A, AllcroftD J, et al. Quantifying public prefer-ences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: a comparison of methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63(1):42-53.
  • 8Surender Kumar, Shunsuke Managi. Compensation for environmental services and intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of India[J].Ecological Economics, 2009,68(12): 3052-3059.
  • 9Ana Villarroya, Jordi Puig. Ecological compensation and environ-mental impact assessment in Spain[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2010,(30): 357-362.
  • 10Lijun Wang. Watershed eco-compensation mechanism and policy study in China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010, 2:1290-1295.

共引文献124

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部