期刊文献+

喉罩下全凭吸入七氟醚维持麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床观察 被引量:4

Clinical observation of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia depends on laryngeal mask in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在腹腔镜胆囊切除手术中应用喉罩通气全凭吸入七氟醚维持麻醉的临床安全性。方法择期行LC的患者60例,随机均分为七氟醚组(A组)和全凭静脉组(B组)。A组采用七氟醚全凭吸入麻醉维持,B组采用丙泊酚、舒芬太尼和罗库溴铵麻醉维持。监测并记录麻醉前后的血流动力学指标;记录喉罩拔除时间,观察恢复期不良反应情况。结果两组术中生命体征差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但A组拔管时间短于B组(P<0.05),且不良反应发生率较B组少(P<0.05)。结论 LC采用喉罩通气全凭吸入七氟醚麻醉维持,能满足喉罩置入及外科手术操作的麻醉要求,操作方便、安全性高。 Objective To explore the clinical safety of sevoflurane inhalation maintenance anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic eholecysteetomy. Methods 60 patients undergoing selective LC were selected and randomly, divided into sevoflurane group (group A) and total intravenous group (B group). Group A were maintained anesthesia with sevoflurane inhalation, group B were maintained anesthesia with Disoprofol, Sufentanil and Rocuronium Bromide. MAP, HR and SpO2 were monitoring and recording before, during and after anesthesia. The time between the end of operation and laryngeal mask remove were recorded. Adverse reactions were observed when they were convalescent. Results There were no significant differences in vital signs of two groups (P 〉 0.05), but the time between the end of operation and laryngeal mask remove of group A was shorter than that of group B (P 〈 0.05), convalescent incidence of adverse reaction was also less than that of B group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion By using sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia with Laryngeal mask in LC, the requirements of laryngeal mask palcement and surgical operation can be met and convenient operation, high safety.
出处 《中国医药科学》 2013年第21期107-108,共2页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 喉罩 吸入麻醉 七氟醚 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 Laryngeal mask Inhalation anesthesia Sevoflurane Laparoseopic choleeystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1杨爱国,聂凯,邹耀祥,刘静,李冉冉.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中肝外胆管损伤的预防措施[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(3):236-237. 被引量:12
  • 2徐革,于泳浩,石钊.全麻喉罩置入和拔出应激反应的临床观察[J].天津医科大学学报,2006,12(2):301-303. 被引量:10
  • 3陈彦波,吴唯.腹腔镜胆囊大部分切除术临床应用探讨[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(2):195-196. 被引量:26
  • 4邢群智 孙丽霞 等.不同麻醉诱导下气管插管对心血管的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2000,16:306-306.
  • 5Calderon E, Torres LM, Calderon-Pla E. Comparative study of inhalation induction by vital capacity breath in audits using 6 sevoflurance with oxygen or 4. 5% sevoflurance in 50% nitrous oxide. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 1999, 46:282-285.
  • 6Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA-' ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth, 2000,84:650-654.
  • 7Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, et al. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg,2000, 91 : 1017-1020.
  • 8Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF. ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 88: 584-587.
  • 9Brimacombe J, Keller C. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck position: a randomized crossover study. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003, 20:65-69.
  • 10Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth, 2000,85:262-266.

共引文献61

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部