期刊文献+

莫沙必利联合帕罗西汀治疗功能性消化不良患者的效果观察 被引量:7

Observation on effect of Mosapride combined with Paroxetine in the treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探究莫沙必利和帕罗西汀结合对功能性消化不良进行治疗的临床效果.方法 选取在浙江省舟山医院消化内科2012年1月~2013年6月收治的150例功能性消化不良患者作为对象.将患者随机分为两组,每组各75例.实验组用莫沙必利和帕罗西汀进行治疗,对照组患者用莫沙必利进行治疗,对两组患者进行治疗效果、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)以及汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)的评定.结果 实验组患者的治疗总有效率为94.67%,高于对照组的78.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后实验组HAMA得分为(8.86±3.15)分,对照组为(16.82±3.24)分;治疗后实验组HAMD得分为(7.18±2.84)分,对照组为(14.47±3.36)分;两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 莫沙必利和帕罗西汀结合治疗功能性消化不良患者总有效率高,且复发率低,值得临床推广. Objective To explore the clinical effect of Mosapride combined with Paroxetine in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.Methods 150 cases of patients with functional dyspepsia admitted to Zhoushan Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January 2012 to June 2013 were chosen as objects.The patients were randomly divided into two groups,with 75 cases in each group,the experiment group was treated with Mosapride and Paroxetine,the control group was treated with Mosapride.The treatment effect,Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and Hamilton anxiety scores (HAMA) of two groups were assessed.Results The total effective rate of experiment group was 94.67%,higher than the 78.67% of control group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).After treatment,the HAMA score of experiment group was (8.86±3.15) points,which of control group was (16.82±3.24) points; HAMD score of experimental group was (7.18±2.84) points,which of control group was (14.47±3.36) points; the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05).Conclusion Mosapride combined with Paroxetine in the treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia has a high total effective rate,and the recurrence rate is low,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2013年第32期89-91,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 莫沙必利 帕罗西汀 功能性消化不良 临床效果 Mosapride Paroxetine Functional dyspepsia Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献68

共引文献84

同被引文献61

  • 1赵欣.功能性消化不良的临床治疗[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(14):80-81. 被引量:2
  • 2Juanda Leo, Hartono Sanjiv, Mahadeva Khean-Lee,ei a/. Anxi-ety and depression in various functional gastrointestinal disor-ders: do differences exist [J]. Journal of digestive diseases ,2012,13(5):252-257.
  • 3AIu,Baranovski O B,Protopopova. et al. Enteral dysfunction asa factor of protein-energy insufficiency development in elderlypersons following gastric surgery [J]. Gerontologicheskoe obsh-chestvo, 2013,26(1):176-182.
  • 4Alexander C, Ford Paul, Moayyedi. Dyspepsia [J]. BMJ (Clini-cal research ed. ),2013,374(1):5059-5060.
  • 5Rodrigo Buzinaro, Suzuki Cristiane Maria,Almeida MarciaAparecida,et al. Absence of Helicobacter pylori high tetracyclineresistant 16S rDNA AGA926-928TTC genotype in gastric biop-sy specimens from dyspeptic patients of a city in the interior ofSo Paulo, Brazil [J]. BMC gastroenterology,2012,12(1) :49-51.
  • 6Wachowska-Kelly P, Walecka-Kapica E, Wojtkiewicz P,etal. Ef-ficacy of sulpiride and itopride in the treatment of functional dys-pepsia in women with emotional and eating disorders [J]. PolMerkur Lekarski,2014,37(217) :39-42.
  • 7Tahara T,Shibata T,Okubo M,et al. Change in DNA Methyla-tion Patterns of SLC6A4 Gene in the Gastric Mucosa in Func-tional Dyspepsia [J]. PLoS One,2014?9(8) :565-566.
  • 8Carbone F,Holvoet L,Vandenberghe A, et al. Functional dys-pepsia: outcome of focus groups for the development of a ques-tionnaire for symptom assessment in patients suffering frompostprandial distress syndrome (PDS) [J]. NeurogastroenterolMotil,2014,7(29) :115-116.
  • 9Geeraerts B, Tack J. Functional dyspepsia: past, present, and future[ J]. J Gastroenterol,2008,43 (4) :251-255.
  • 10杨霞,柏愚,邹多武,李兆申.以罗马Ⅲ标准为基础的功能性消化不良临床研究[J].胃肠病学,2010,15(5):292-295. 被引量:11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部