期刊文献+

产品负面报道的金融加速器效应实证分析——以三鹿毒奶粉事件溢出效应为例 被引量:6

An Empirical Study on the Financial Accelerator Effect of Negative Reports on Product——Case of Spillover Effect of Sanlu Milk Powder Public Scandal
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用12家乳制品类上市公司2005-2012年的季度动态面板数据,文章对"三鹿毒奶粉事件"这一产品负面报道的"小冲击,大波动"的金融加速器效应进行了检验,结果发现,在研究的样本范围内,存在金融加速器效应;但金融加速器效应的两个不对称特征与理论本身所揭示的相反,即受冲击时期的资产负债表状况对投资支出影响显著但敏感性弱于其他时期;大公司的资产负债表效应更显著且受冲击时这种效应也很显著。这可能源于产品负面报道的溢出效应不仅带来了传染,也带来了竞争,在危机时期,大公司更倾向于采用竞争策略,夺占问题企业的市场份额。 Using quarter dynamic panel data of 12 listed-companies of dairy industry from 2005 to 2012,the paper empiri cally analyzes the small shocks and large fluctuations of the financial accelerator effect of negative reports on product of Sanlu Milk Powder Scandal Event and finds that the financial accelerator is existence but its two asymmetric features are contrary to theoretical expectations.In other words,the influence of balance sheet to investment is significant during the crisis and the sen sitivity is weaker than other periods; Large company's balance sheet effects are more significant and the sensitivity of big com pany's investment to balance sheet is more significant during the crisis,which may result from the spillover effects of product negative reports not to bring contagion effects but effects of competition and in order to seize market share during the crisis,big companies are more likely to adopt competitive strategy.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2014年第1期164-171,共8页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"跨企业边界的成本协同管理与价值创造驱动因素研究"(70872096) 中国博士后基金项目"产品负面报道的金融加速器效应研究--以不信任情绪蔓延和资产负债表传染为中介变量"(2011M500884) 教育部人文社会科学规划项目"产品负面报道的资产负债表传染的防治研究:ERM-IF下CSR导向内部控制框架构建"(12YJAZH106) 南京审计学院项目"高管层财务决策的走向 贸易信贷及资本结构的链式调整:基于前景理论的分析"(NSK2009/B13) 江苏省2010年"青蓝工程"优秀青年骨干教师培养计划(苏教师【2010】27号)
关键词 产品负面报道 金融加速器效应 动态面板数据 negative reports on product financial accelerator effect dynamic panel data
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Bemanke B, Gertler M,Gilchrist S. The financial acceleratorand the flight to quality [j]. The Review of Economics and Sta-tistics, 1996(1) : 1-15.
  • 2赵振全,于震,刘淼.金融加速器效应在中国存在吗?[J].经济研究,2007,42(6):27-38. 被引量:181
  • 3Cochrane John H. Permanent and transitory components ofGNP and stock prices [j]. The Quarterly Journal of Econom-ics, 1994,109(1) :241-265.
  • 4BeaudryP, Portier F. An exploration into Pigou’s theory of cy-cles [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2004, 51 (6):1183-1216.
  • 5SorokaS, McAdams S. An experimental study of the differen-tial effects of positive versus negative news content [ C ]. TheElections, Public Opinion and Parties Annual Conference,University of Essex, Colchester UK,2010, (9): 10-12.
  • 6SkowronskiJ J, Carlston D E. Negativity and extremity biasesin impression formation : A review of the explanations [ J ]. Psy-chological Bulletin, 1989,105(1): 131-142.
  • 7Bond J, Kirshenbaum R. Under the radar: Talking to today * scynical consumer[M]. New work: John Wiley and sons, 1988.
  • 8FiskeS T. Attention and weight in person perception : the im-pact of negative and extreme behavior[J]. Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 1980,38(6) :889-906.
  • 9Weinberger M C, William R D. The effects of unfavorableproduct rating information [J].Advances in Consumer Re-search, 1986(7) :528-532.
  • 10孙艳辞.产品伤害危机后消费者信心和行为研究[D].上海:东华大学,2010.

共引文献514

同被引文献52

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部