1Belanger G. Morphogenetic and structural characteristic of field-growth cultivars differing in maturity[J]. Can. J. Plant. Sci. , 1996, (76) :277-282.
2Seiji K, Kouji K I, Masao N O. Comparison of growth and responses to nitrogen fertilization among three timothy (Phleum pratense L. ) varieties with different heading stages in Konsen District of Hokkaido[J]. Japan. Grassl. Sci., 1992,38(3) : 251-258.
3Belanger G, Mcqueen R E. Leaf and stem nutritive value of timothy cultivars differing in maturity[J].Can. J. Plant Sci. , 1997, (77):237-245.
4Seiji K, Masao N. Effect of early harvesting on dry matter yield, total digestible nutrients and weed invasion in timothy pure meadows [J]. Japan Grassl Sci. , 1994, 39 (4): 429-436.
5Durand J, Surprenant J. Relationship between morphology and quality in timothy (Phleum pratense L. )[J]. Can. J. Plant Sci. , 1993,(73):803-814.
6Tsuneo K, Tomoko O A, Tadashi K, et al. Relationship between the date of cutting and nutritive value of timothy (Phleum pratense L. ) hay in Northern Tohoku Distriet[J]. Grassland Science,1997,43(2) : 168-170.
7Belanger G, McQueen R E. Digestibility and cell wall concentration of early and late-maturing timothy cultivars[J]. Can. J. Plant Sci. , 1996, (76) :107-112.
8Fick G W. The influence of environment on forage.quality[J]. Agro. J. , 1998,(79) :271-275.
9Belanger G, Richards ] E. Growth analysis of timothy cuhivars differing in maturity[J]. Can. J. Plant Sci. , 1995, (75):643-648.
