期刊文献+

基于模糊匹配的跨学科专家团队发现算法研究 被引量:10

Algorithm Research on Discovery of Interdisciplinary Team of Experts Based on Fuzzy Matching
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着知识经济和大学科时代的到来,构建跨学科专家团队势在必行,但目前构建程序尚不客观,同时也缺乏程式化的团队需求描述体系及专家可信度评价机制,为此我们提出了基于模糊匹配的跨学科专家团队发现算法。算法通过引入程式化逻辑符号,率先完成了团队需求向团队特征向量的转化,生成了基于知识智能的专家特征向量。然后,在特征词关联矩阵构建的基础之上,实现了两类向量的模糊匹配。最后,以P@N为评价指标,参考数学中收敛原理,设计了候选专家可信度评价程序。实例分析表明,该算法相比之前向量余弦运算方式更为准确可靠。 With the arrival of the era of knowledge economy and integration among disciplines, it is imperative to build interdisciplinary team of experts, but now the building process is not objective, meaningwhile, it is also lack of stylized description about team needs and credibility evaluation mechanisms for expert. In view of those, we present an interdisciplinary team of experts discovery algorithm based on the fuzzy matching. Firstly, we introduce stylized logical symbols to complete the transformation from team needs to team eigenveetor and generate the expert eigenvector based on knowledge intelligence. Thirdly, we achieve the fuzzy matching process on the basis of construction of keywords connection matrix. Finally, we design the credibility assessment procedure for candidate expert, which sets P@ N as evaluation indicator and refers to the mathematical principle of convergence. Instance analysis has demonstrated that the algorithm is more accurate and reliable than the previous eigenvector matching via cosine operations.
作者 李纲 叶光辉
出处 《情报学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期68-76,共9页 Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金 国家自然科学基金研究项目“科研团队动态演化规律研究”(项目编号:71273196) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“智慧城市应急决策情报体系建设研究”(项目编号:13&ZD173)研究成果之一
关键词 模糊匹配 跨学科专家团队 特征向量 降噪 可信度评价 fuzzy matching,interdisciplinary team of experts,eigenvector,denoise, credibility evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Pennington D D. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning [ J ]. Ecology and Society, 2008, 13 ( 2 ) :8-8.
  • 2Cummings J N, Kiesler S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries [ J ]. Social Studies of Science ,2005,35 ( 5 ) :703-722.
  • 3Stvilia B,Hinnant C C, Schindler K, et al. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62 ( 2 ) : 270-283.
  • 4Wuchty S,Jones B F,Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge [ J ]. Science, 2007,316 (5827) :1036-1039.
  • 5Btirner K, Dall'Asta L, Ke W,et al. Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co- authorship teams [ J]. Complexity, 2005, 10(4) :57-67.
  • 6Sundstorm E, De Meuse K P, Futrell D. Work teams: application and effectiveness [J]. American Psychologist, 1990, 45(2) :120-133.
  • 7陈春华.科研团队运作管理[M].北京:科学出版社,2004..
  • 8Fang Y, Si L, Mathur A. FacFinder: Search for Expertise in Academic Institutions [ R ]. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 2005.
  • 9Rhoten D. Final report: A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration [ R ]. San Francisco: The Hybrid Vigor Institute, 2003.
  • 10程少川,李高,郑俊.面向跨学科创新合作的知识推送方法研究[J].情报学报,2013,32(2):148-153. 被引量:4

二级参考文献68

共引文献34

同被引文献142

引证文献10

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部