期刊文献+

早产小于胎龄儿与适于胎龄儿住院期间生长代谢的临床研究 被引量:15

Comparison of the growth and metabolism between SGA and AGA preterm infants during hospital stays
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨早产小于胎龄儿(SGA)与适于胎龄儿(AGA)住院期间生长代谢的差异.方法 回顾性分析我院2008年1月至2012年12月收治的胎龄28 ~ 34周早产儿病例,根据胎龄与出生体重的关系分为SGA组与AGA组,比较两组早产儿一般情况、体格增长、血生化指标及合并症等.结果 纳入研究的早产儿共164例,SGA组78例,AGA组86例.2组早产儿入院胎龄、性别、发生呼吸窘迫综合征的比例、恢复出生体重日龄等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).SGA组与AGA组相比,窒息比例高(25.6%比12.8%),住院时间长[36.5(28,45.5)天比28(22,36)天],肠外营养时间长[26(19,35)天比22(16,30)天],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).恢复出生体重后,SGA组与AGA组相比平均每日体重增长速率快[(20.6&#177;3.3) g/(kg&#183; d)比(18.4&#177;3.8)g/(kg&#183;d)],每周头围增长速度快[(0.71&#177;0.25) cm比(0.55&#177;0.26) cm],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),每周身长增长速度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).SGA组前白蛋白低于AGA组,胆汁酸高于AGA组,败血症和慢性肺疾病发生率均高于AGA组(20.5%比9.3%,11.5%比1.2%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),早产儿视网膜病和坏死性小肠结肠炎发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 SGA早产儿恢复出生体重后生长速率及头围增长速度快于AGA早产儿,但身长增长速度无差异;SGA早产儿出生及出院时血前白蛋白水平均低于AGA早产儿;SGA早产儿更易发生胆汁淤积、败血症及慢性肺疾病. Objective To explore the possible differences of growth and metabolic patterns between SGA and AGA preterm infants during hospital stays. Methods Premature infants born at gestational age between 28 weeks and 34 weeks,admitted to the NICU of PUMCH from Jan. 2008 to Dec. 2012,were enrolled and were divided into SGA and AGA groups. General information,growth patterns,biochemical indexes and complications were compared. Results Total of 164 premature infants,including 91male and 73 female,were enrolled. Among them,78 infants were in the SGA group and 86 infants were in the AGA group. No statistically significant difference( P > 0. 05) was found in gestational age,gender,occurrence of respiratory distress syndrome( RDS) and days needed to regainbirth weight between the two groups. Comparing to the infants in the AGA group,those in the SGA group had higher occurrence of asphyxia( 25. 6% vs. 12. 8%),longer duration of hospital stay [36. 5( 28,45. 5) d vs. 28( 22,36) d],and longer course of parenteral nutrition [26( 19,35) d vs. 22( 16,30) d]( P <0. 05). Interestingly,infants in the SGA group had higher rate of weight growth after regained birth weight [( 20. 6 ± 3. 3) g /( kg·d) vs.( 18. 4 ± 3. 8) g /( kg·d) ],and faster weekly head circumference growth [( 0. 71 ± 0. 25) cm vs.( 0. 55 ± 0. 26) cm] than the infants in the AGA group( P < 0. 05);however,no difference on weekly rate of length growth was found between the two groups. Infants in the SGA group also had lower level of serum prealbumin( P < 0. 01),higher level bile acids than the levels in the AGA infants( P < 0. 05). Furthermore,infants in the SGA group showed significantly higher risk of developing sepsis( 20. 5% vs. 9. 3%,P < 0. 05) and chronic lung disease( CLD)( 11. 5% vs.1. 1%,P < 0. 01), while the occurrence of retinopathy of prematurity( ROP) and necrotizing enterocolitis( NEC) revealed no difference( P > 0. 05). Conclusions Comparing to the AGA premature infants,SGA premature infants had higher rate of weight growth after regained birth weight,faster rate of weekly head circumference growth,lower serum prealbumin level and higher risk of developing cholestasis,sepsis and chronic lung diseases.
出处 《中国新生儿科杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期73-77,共5页 Chinese Journal of Neonatology
关键词 小于胎龄儿 适于胎龄儿 婴儿 早产 生长和发育 Small for gestational age Appropriate for gestational age Infant,premature Growth and development
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Patel AL, Engstrom JL, Meier PP, et al. Calculating postnatalgrowth velocity in very low birth weight (VLBW) premature infants. J Perinatol, 2009, 29:618-622.
  • 2韩露艳,王晨,李正红,王丹华.早期营养支持策略对早产儿生长和代谢的影响[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2012,27(5):296-301. 被引量:26
  • 3孙秀静,余欣庭,王丹华,全国早产儿营养调查协作组.以年龄别体重z评分方法评价早产儿住院期间生长情况的临床研究[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2010,25(5):263-267. 被引量:19
  • 4邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学.第4版.人民卫生出版社,2011,80-81.
  • 5庞江帆,单晋平,张军,阎奇,王亚娜.早产小于胎龄儿发育特征研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2007,15(1):48-50. 被引量:15
  • 6Bocca-Tjeertes IF,Reijneveld SA, Kerstjens JM,et al. Growth in small-for-gestational-age-preterm born children from 0 to 4 years : the role of both prematurity and SGA status. Neonatology, 2013, 103:293-299.
  • 7汪浩文,陈红霞,吴超华,张岚.不同营养方式对小于胎龄儿生长发育影响的临床对照研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(9):649-651. 被引量:8
  • 8Joss-Moore LA, Lane RH. Perinatal nutrition, epigenetics, and disease. NeoReviews, 2011, 12:498-505.
  • 9Mukhopadhyay K,Narnag A, Mabajan R. Effect of human milk fortification in appropriate for gestation and small for gestation preterm babies: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr, 2007, 44:286-290.
  • 10Moreira M,Soares FV, Meio MD, et al. Energy expenditure in very low birth weight newborns: a comparison between small and appropriate-for-gestational-age. Acta Paediatr, 2010, 99 : 651- 653.

二级参考文献58

共引文献221

同被引文献116

  • 1朱畅宁.智力低下的病因和诊断[J].中国实用儿科杂志,1994,9(3):131-134. 被引量:6
  • 2蔡威,汤庆娅,陶晔璇,冯一.中国新生儿营养支持临床应用指南[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(9):711-714. 被引量:210
  • 3庞江帆,单晋平,张军,阎奇,王亚娜.早产小于胎龄儿发育特征研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2007,15(1):48-50. 被引量:15
  • 4邵肖梅,叶鸿瑶,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:807-808.
  • 5童笑梅.坏死性小肠结肠炎[M]//邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:477-483.
  • 6陈超.新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎的热点问题[J].中国循证儿科杂,2011(9):6(5):321.
  • 7沙小丹.剖宫产新生儿临床特点的前瞻性多中心研究[D].上海:复旦大学儿科医院,2012:1-104.
  • 8Omer SB, Goodman D, Steinhoff MC,et al.Maternal influen- za immunization and reduced likelihood of prematurity and small for gestational age births:a retrospective cohort study [J].PLoS Med,2011,8 (5) : e1000441.
  • 9Tobi EW, Heijmans BT,Kremer D,et al.DNA methylation of IGF2, GNASAS, INSIGF and LEP and being born small for gestational age[J].Epigeneties, 2011,6 (2) : 171-176.
  • 10Odibo AO ,Francis A, Cahill AG,et d.Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard[J].J Matern Fetal Neona- tal Med ,2011,24(3) :411-417.

引证文献15

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部