期刊文献+

保乳结合前哨淋巴结活检术治疗老年乳腺癌的有效性和安全性分析 被引量:7

Effectiveness and safety analysis of breast-conserving therapy combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of elderly patients with breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析保乳结合前哨淋巴结活检术治疗老年乳腺癌的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年4月至2013年4月间收治的100例老年乳腺癌患者的临床资料,按手术方式分为行保乳结合前哨淋巴结活检术治疗的观察组和行传统手术治疗的对照组,每组各50例,比较两组患者治疗的有效性和安全性指标。结果观察组患者的手术时间和拔管时间均小于对照组,术中出血量和总引流量少于对照组,观察组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论保乳结合前哨淋巴结活检术治疗老年乳腺癌安全可行,值得推广。 Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of breast-conserving therapy combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of elderly patients with breast cancer. Methods The clin- ical data of 100 cases of elderly breast cancer patients who had been treated from April 2011 to April 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were devided into the observation group and the control group (50 ca- ses respectively) , receiving breast-conserving therapy combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and con- vention therapy respectivvely. Clinical indexes were compared. Results The surgical time and extubation time of the observation group were significantly shorter, the blood loss and total drainage volume were signifi- cantly less, the postoperative complication rates were significantly lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions The combination of breast-conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy has safe and feasible effect in the treatment of elderly patients with breast cancer,deserving further clinical application.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2014年第3期302-303,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 保乳结合前哨淋巴结活检术 乳腺肿瘤 有效性 安全性 Breast-conserving surgery combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy Breast neo- plasms Effectiveness Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1王中华,徐兵河.129例30岁以下女性乳腺癌的临床特点及预后分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(2):111-113. 被引量:40
  • 2江泽飞,宋三泰,孙燕.乳腺癌内分泌治疗的基本原则和新动向——2006年美国NCCN乳癌内分泌治疗指南解读[J].临床药物治疗杂志,2006,4(2):21-25. 被引量:20
  • 3王永胜,左文述,刘娟娟,于志勇,刘岩松,李永清,周正波,刘雁冰,李济宇,赵桐,陈鹏.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝清扫术前瞻性非随机对照临床研究[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(2):104-107. 被引量:32
  • 4王永胜.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的安全性[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(9):685-688. 被引量:28
  • 5Silverstein M J, Lagios MD, Recht A, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment [ J ]. J Am Coll Surg,2005,201 (4) :586 - 597.
  • 6Carlson RW, Anderson BO, Burstein HJ, et al. NCCN breast cancer clinical practice guidelines in oncology [ EB/OL ]. [ 2007 - 01 - 25 ]. http ://www. nccn. org/physician gls/PDF/breastpdr.
  • 7Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD, et al. Progress and promise : highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007 [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 2007, 18 (17) :1133 - 1144.
  • 8Blumencranz P, Deck KB, Whitworth PW, et al. Multiplex Molecular assay has improved sensitivity over histological intra-operative nodal tests for breast cancer patients-results from a large multi-center trial [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2006, 1130 (1): 14.
  • 9Fleissig A, Fallowfield LJ, Langridge CI, et al. Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2006,95 ( 3 ) :279 - 293.
  • 10Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2003,349 ( 6 ) :546 - 553.

共引文献141

同被引文献47

  • 1张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民,李波,姜军,杨名添,王水,宋三泰,张斌,杨红健.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11):680-684. 被引量:247
  • 2中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2007版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2007,17(5):410-428. 被引量:235
  • 3Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpecto- my, and lumpeetomy plus irradiation for the treatment of in- vasive breast cancer [ J ~. N Engl J Med, 2002,347 ( 16 ) : 1233-1241.
  • 4Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, et al. Twenty-five-year fol- low-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy,and total mastectomy followed by irradia- tion[J~. N Engl J Med,2002,347(8) :567-575.
  • 5Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, et al. Lymphatic m- apping and sentinel lymph adenectomy for breast cancer [ J 1. Ann Surg, 1994,220 (3) :391-401.
  • 6Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation[ J]. N Engl J Med, 1985,312(11 ) :674-681.
  • 7Donker M, Litiere S,Werutsky G,et al . Breast-conservingtreatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma InSitu; 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence,from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial[J]. J ClinOncol, 2013,31(32):4054-4059.
  • 8Clough KB CJ? Fitoussi A, Nos C,et al . Cosmetic sequelaeafter conservative treatment for breast cancer: classificationand results of surgical correction[J]. Ann Plast Surg , 1998,41(5):471-481.
  • 9EXAniello C,Grimaldi L,Barbato A,et al , Cosmetic resultsin 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breastcancer[J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg? 1999,33(4): 419-422.
  • 10Fitoussi AD, Berry MG,Fama F, et al . Oncoplastic breastsurgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases[J]. PlastReconstr Surg,2010,125(2) : 454-462.

引证文献7

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部