基于组织模块化与技术模块化“同构/异构”协同的跨边界研发网络架构被引量：26

Building Cross-boundary R&D Network Based on the Isomeric/Isomorphic Synergy between Organizational Modularization and Technological Modularization

原文传递

导出

摘要组织模块化和技术模块化之间的匹配关系,是设计与架构跨边界研发网络的关键,因而成为通过拓展研发网络边界进行技术追赶的中国企业必须面临并处理的战略问题。本文通过探索性多案例分析,探究全球化情境下组织身份差异及单体技术与系统技术差距带来的双重影响,解构组织模块化和技术模块化间同构/异构的协同方式,建立基于组织模块化和技术模块化协同的跨边界研发网络架构。一方面,本文指出组织模块化和技术模块化的拼合式协同、聚拢式协同、获取式协同、整合式协同是规避由组织身份差异以及单体与系统技术差距带来障碍的重要方式,同时这四种协同方式体现同构/异构的范式;另一方面,本文发现了接受、减弱、回避、整合四种组织身份管理响应机制以保障同构/异构协同的实现。最后,从跨边界研发网络架构障碍克服与协同运作机制以及跨边界研发网络架构设计规则的二元性两个角度阐述了本文结论的启示意义。 The dynamic synergy between organizational modularization and technological nmdularization is the key of designing and constructing cross-boundary R＆D network, so as to become an essential issue for Chinese firms who seek rapid technology promotion. Based on exploratory multiple case study, this paper analyzes the dual influences of organizational identity difference and technological gap, and deconstructs the isomorphic/isomeric synergy modes of organizational modularization and technological modularization, which would help Chinese firms to find out the optimal choices of building cross-boundary R＆D network. The results show that synergy modes of organizational modularization and technological modularization （i.e., coherent synergy, assembling synergy, acquiring synergy, and integrating synergy） are four main solutions for managing systematic and/or modular technology gaps and organizational identity gaps. Moreover, the results indicate that accepting, weakening, avoidig, and integrating are four kinds of organizational identity management response mechanism to safeguard the realization of synergy. These results have both direct and indirect managerial implications for Chinese firms.

作者魏江黄学刘洋

机构地区浙江大学管理学院

出处《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期148-160,共13页 China Industrial Economics

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目"经济结构转型研发网络情境下企业技术创新能力演化规律研究"(批准号71132007) 浙江省自然科学基金杰出青年项目"产业集群情境下企业超本地网络嵌入知识重构与能力跃迁"(批准号R6110132)

关键词组织模块化技术模块化协同技术差距组织身份 organizational modularization technological modularization synergy technological gap organizational identity

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Herrigel, G., Wittke, V., and Voskamp, U. The Process of Chinese Manufacturing Upgrading: Transitioning from Unilateral to Recursive Mutual Learning Relations[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2013,3(1 ).
2Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., and Jiang, Y. An Institution-based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008,39(5).
3Euo, Y., Tung, R. L. International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises: A Springboard Perspective[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007,38(4).
4MacCormack, A., C. Baldwin, and J. Rusnak. Exploring the Duality between Product and Organizational Architectures: A Test of the "Mirroring Hypothesis"[J]. Research Policy, 2012,41(8).
5Colfer, L., Baldwin, C. The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions [R]. Harvard Business School, 2010.
6Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., and Van de Ven, A. H. Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013,56(1).
7Eisenhardt, K. M. Building Theories .from Case Study Research [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14 (4).
8MaeDuffie, J. P., Modularity-as-Property, Modularization-as-Process, and 'Modularity'-as-Frame: Lessons from Product Architecture Initiatives in the Global Automotive Industry[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2013,3( 1 ).
9Simon, H. A. The Architecture of Complexity [J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1962, 106(6).
10Furlan, A., A. Cabigiosu, and A. Camuffo. When the Mirror Gets Misted Up: Modularity Change[EB/OL]. http ://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN) 1097-0266/earlyview.

二级参考文献107

1周凯,刘辉锋.基于模块化理论的企业组织研究[J].林业经济,2006(4):47-49. 被引量：4
2[日]青木昌彦,安藤晴彦.模块时代-新产业结构的本质[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2003.
3Baldwin, C. Y.,and K. B. Clark. Managing in an Age of Modularity[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997,75(5).
4Baldwin, C. Y., and K. B. Clark. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
5Brusoni, S., and A. Prencipe. A Dialectical Model of Organizational Loose Coupling: Modularity, Systems Integration, and Innovation[C]. The DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference, 2005.
6Brusoni, S., and A. Prencipe. Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspectives [J]. Organization Science, 2006, 17(2).
7Ethiraj, S., K., D. Levinthal, and R. R. Roy. The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(5).
8Fleming, L., and O. Sorenson. The Dangers of Modularity[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2001, 79(8).
9Galunic, D. C., and K. M. Eisenhardt. Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6).
10Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and R. N. Langlois. Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organization[M]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2003.