期刊文献+

影响微种植体支抗稳定性的相关因素 被引量:3

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 稳定的支抗是正畸治疗成功的关键。传统支抗装置存在着操作复杂、可靠性差、患者不合作等方面的缺陷,给治疗带来很多困难。针对这些存在的问题,越来越多的正畸医师不断尝试应用种植体作为移动牙齿的支抗。微种植体的优点在于创伤小、不依赖患者配合、可有效缩短疗程、治疗后易取出等优点,已经受到临床医生的广泛关注。影响微种植体支抗稳定性的因素很多,本文就微种植体、患者、临床应用等几方面进行阐述。
出处 《河北联合大学学报(医学版)》 2014年第2期164-165,共2页 Journal of North China Coal Medical College
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1王震东,王林,倪晓宇,马俊青.不同长度微种植体支抗应力差异的三维有限元研究[J].口腔医学,2005,25(2):96-97. 被引量:45
  • 2Miyawaki S, Koyam a I, Inoue M, et al. Factors associ ated with the sta- bility of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage[ J ]. Am J Orthod Den to facial Orthop ,2003,124 (4) :373.
  • 3Cheng S J, Tseng IY, Lee J J, et al. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini - implants used for orthedontie anchorage [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant s,2004,19(1) :100.
  • 4Miyawaki S, Koyamal, Inoue M, et al. Factors associated with the stabil- ity of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic an- chorage [J].Am J Orthod Dentofae Orthop,2003,124(4) :373.
  • 5龙红月,林珠,兰泽栋,周磊.支抗种植体外形对骨界面应力分布的影响[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2003,8(2):61-63. 被引量:11
  • 6兰泽栋,林珠,龙红月,周磊.支抗种植体不同螺纹顶角对骨界面应力分布的影响[J].广东牙病防治,2003,11(4):259-261. 被引量:13
  • 7Park YC, K/m JK, Lee JS. Atlas of Contemporary Orthodontics[ M]. Se- oul:Shin Hung International,2005.01 - 104,145 - 161.
  • 8Wu TY, Kuang SH, Wu CH. Factors associated with the stability of mini - implants for orthodontic anchorage:a study of 414 samples in Taiwan [ J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2009,67 ( 8 ) : 1595.
  • 9Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM. Development of micmimplants for intrao- ral anehorage[ J]. J Clin Orthod,2003,37(3) :321.
  • 10王震东,陈文静主译.微种植体支抗正畸临床应用[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2009:3-4.

二级参考文献52

  • 1黄辉,马轩祥,张少锋.螺纹顶角角度对牙柱状螺旋根骨内种植体应力分布的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1996,12(2):119-121. 被引量:25
  • 2赖红昌,熊焕国,薛淼,杨宠莹,张保卫.不同长度种植体对骨界面应力影响的三维有限元分析[J].上海口腔医学,1997,6(1):20-22. 被引量:18
  • 3岑远坤,毛祥彦,何佳凝,鲜苏琴.全下颌牙种植义齿及支持组织应力的三维有限元分析Ⅴ.种植体类型对覆盖种植义齿应力分布的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1997,15(1):64-66. 被引量:5
  • 4[7]Gray JB, Steen ME, King GJ, et al. Studies on the efficacy of implants as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod, 1983,83(4) :311-317
  • 5[9]Glatzmaier J, Wehrcein H, Diedrich P, et al. Biodegradable implants for orthodontic anchorage. Eur J Orthod, 1996,18(5) :465-469
  • 6[10]Hanawa T. Titanium and its oxide film: A substrate for formation of apatite. In: Davies JE (ed). Bone-bimaterial Interface. Toronto: Univ of Toronto Press. 1991.49
  • 7[11]GrayJB, StcenME, KingGJ, etal. Studies on the efficacy of implants as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod, 1983,83 (4): 311-317
  • 8[12]HursonS. Thread implant design critera. Int J Dent Symp, 1994,2(1):38
  • 9[1]Mailath G, Stoiber B, Atzek C, et al. Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants-a biomechanical phenomenon: Finite element study.Z Stomatol, 1989,86(4) :207-216
  • 10[2]Holmgren EP, Scekinger RJ, Kilgren LM, et al. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol, 1998,24(2):80-88

共引文献69

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部