期刊文献+

机器人前列腺癌根治术治疗大体积前列腺癌的难点与技巧分析 被引量:4

Difficulties and operative skills in robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with large prostate glands
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:总结机器人前列腺癌根治术治疗大体积前列腺癌(〉100g)的难点及其解决的技巧分析,提高前列腺癌根治术治疗大体积前列腺癌的手术水平。方法:我院自2012年4月~2013年12月间采用机器人前列腺癌根治术治疗大体积前列腺癌患者共5例,术后分析其PSA、年龄、前列腺体积、回顾其手术录像和术前影像学检查等资料,对其手术难点和技巧进行总结。结果:5例患者均顺利完成手术,平均出血量300(100-800)ml,无输血病例。术后平均拔管时间12.8(10~14)d,术后平均住院时间8.8(7~10)d。术后1个月内有3例患者尿控恢复满意(每天用≤1块尿垫),另2例患者在3个月内恢复满意。5例患者在术后第6周复查PSA均〈0.01μg/L。结论:大体积前列腺癌行机器人前列腺癌根治术难度较大,但在有熟练操作技能的前提下应用一定的手术技巧,采用机器人前列腺癌根治术治疗大体积前列腺癌还是具有可行性的。 Objective: To summarize the operative difficulties and skills in robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with large prostate glands (〉100 g) so as to improve the operation technique. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the data of five prostate cancer patients with large prostate glands who were performed robotic radical prostateetomy from April 2012 to December 2013. The data of PSA, age, prostate volume, opera- tive videos and the result of preoperative imaging examination were studied. Result: All the five cases were opera- ted successfully. The average blood loss was 300 (range, 100-800) ml, and no blood transfusion case was found. The average indwelling time was 12.8 (range, 10-14) days, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 8.8 (range, 7-10) days. At one month postoperatively, three of them were satisfied with urinary continence recovery and no more than one pad was used in a day. Another two patients were satisfied with urinary continence recovery within three months postoperatively. Moreover, the results of PSA of all five patients decreased to d0.01 μg/L at postoperative six weeks. Conclusion: Though robotic radical prostatectomy in large prostate glands poses a signifi- cant challenge to urologists, it is feasible when we have basic robotic surgical skills and the techniuue is practised.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2014年第4期281-283,286,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 前列腺癌 大体积 机器人 prostate cancer large volume robot
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1El-Hakim A, Leung R A, Richstone L, et al. Athermal Robotic Technique of prostatectomy in patients with large prostate glands (>75 g): technique and initial results[J]. BJU Int , 2006, 98(1): 47-49.
  • 2Singh A, Fagin R. Shah G. et al. Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J]. J Urol. 2005,173(2): 552-554.
  • 3高江平,徐阿祥,董隽,王威,朱捷,崔亮,洪宝发,张旭.机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术16例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2009,30(7):472-475. 被引量:35
  • 4Feneley M R, Landis P, Simon J, et al. Today men with prostate cancer have larger prostates[J]. Urology, 2000, 56(5): 839-842.
  • 5Valdivieso R F, Hueber P A, Zorn K C. Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: how I do it. Part II: surgical technique[J]. Can J Urol , 2013, 20(6): 7073-7078.
  • 6Zorn K C, Gautam G, Shalhav A L, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robot- ic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons [J]. J Urol, 2009, 182 (3) : 1126-1132.
  • 7Menon M, Hemal A K. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy: experience in more than 1 000 cases[J], J Endourol, 2004, 18(7): 611-619; discussion 619.

二级参考文献13

  • 1李爱华,Demetrius H.Bagley,Edouard Trabulsi,Deborah T.Glassman,Stephen Strup,Mark Chang,Dolores Shupp-Byrne,Leonard G.Gomella.159例腹腔镜根治性前列腺癌切除术的疗效评估[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(12):816-819. 被引量:4
  • 2Ahlering TE,Skarecky D,Lee D,et al.Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interfaces initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Urol,2003,170:1738-1741.
  • 3Badani KK,Kaul S,Menon M.Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy:assessment after 2766 procedures.Cancer,2007,110.-1951-1958.
  • 4Berryhill R Jr,Jhaveri J,Yadav R,et al.Robotic prostatectomy:a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches.Urology,2008,72:15-23.
  • 5Eastham JA,Kattan MW,Riedel E,et al.Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.J Urol,2003,170:2292-2295.
  • 6Patel VR,Tully AS,Holmes R,et al.Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting the learning curve and beyond:initial 200 eases.J Urol,2005,174:269-272.
  • 7Patel VR,Thaly R,Shah K.Robotic radical prostatectomy:outcomes of 500 eases.BJU Int,2007,99:1109-1112.
  • 8Tewari A,Srivasatava A,Menon M.A prospective comparison of radical retropubie and robot-assisted prostateetomy:experience in one institution.BJU Int,2003,92:205-210.
  • 9Takenaka A,Tewari AK,Leung RA,et al.Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostateetomy:anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes.Eur Urol,2007,51:433-440.
  • 10Ficarra V,Cavalleri S,Novara G,et al.Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,a systematic review.Eur Urol,2007,51:45-56.

共引文献34

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部