期刊文献+

基于推荐-传播模型的学术论文评价方法 被引量:3

Evaluation Method of Academic Paper Based on the Recommendation-propagation Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 认为学术论文评价方法在引导基础研究人员行为和科研产出方面具有重要作用,故有必要制定成本合理、科学公正的评价体系。以文献[3]提出的论文推荐-传播模型为基准,通过控制评价信息中大同行和小同行的比例、评价对象的选择方法以及给推荐者赋权3个策略来优化推荐-传播模型的学术评价功能。运用仿真方法验证优化策略的有效性后,提出利用平台用户的推荐-传播行为,自动计算学术论文影响指数、质量指数和价值指数的方法,从而构建一种新的学术论文评价方法。 Considering the critical role of academic paper' evaluation method in leading behaviors and scientific outputs of basic discipline researchers, it is of much necessary to design evaluation system with reasonable cost and scien- tific and fair methods. Taking the paper recommendation-propagation model proposed in Ref. [ 3 ] as the benchmark, three strategies are proposed to optimize the academic evaluation function of the recommendation-propagation model, including controlling the rate of big peers and small peers in evaluation information, choosing the appropriate method of evaluating objects, and assigning weight to eachpaper recommender. Based on validating the effects of the optimization strategies with simulation experiments, this paper proposes an academic paper' s evaluation method, which automatically computes influ- ence index, quality index and value index to measure the academic contribution of papers through users' recommendation -propagation behaviors.
作者 惠淑敏
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期85-93,共9页 Library and Information Service
关键词 评价功能 协同过滤 同行评议 优化策略 evaluation function collaborative filtering peer review optimization strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1吴建国.国立科研机构经费使用效益比较研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(5):163-168. 被引量:16
  • 2Lutz B. Scientificpeer review : An analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories [ J ]. Human Architecture : Journal of The Sociology of Self - Knowledge, 2008, 6(2) : 23 -38.
  • 3段文奇,惠淑敏.基于协同过滤的论文推荐-传播平台模型研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30(10):1462-1467. 被引量:10
  • 4Bruno S F, Katja R. Do rankings reflect research quality? [ J ]. Journal of Applied Economics, 2010, 8 (1) : 1 -38.
  • 5蔡琼,苏丽,丁宇.从行政主导转向国家主导:我国科研评价制度的理性选择[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(9):35-39. 被引量:7
  • 6王莉华.同行评议科研评价的运行管理:英国RAE案例的启示[J].中国高教研究,2012(5):53-57. 被引量:7
  • 7Lawrence S, Aaron L. Citation rates in mathematics a study of vari- ation by subdiscipline [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91 (3) : 911 - 924.
  • 8MacRoberts M H, MacRoberts B R. Problems of citation analysis : A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences [ J ]. Journal of the A- merican Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61 (1):1 -13.
  • 9Zhou Yanbo, Lv Linyuan, Li Menghui. Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications distinguishing between prestige and popularity [J]. New Journal of Physies, 2012, 14 (033033) : 1 - 17.
  • 10Buschman M, Miehalek A. Are alternative metrics still alternative [ J]. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Tech- nology, 2013, 39(4) : 35 -39.

二级参考文献162

共引文献111

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部