期刊文献+

产品碳足迹评价中不确定度与敏感度相结合的数据质量分析 被引量:11

Data quality analysis with combination uncertainty and sensitivity for carbon footprint assessment of products.
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 产品碳足迹评价中,数据种类、来源、获取途径和量化方法的选择不同将直接影响到评价结果的可靠与否.本文建立了结合敏感度和DQI-Monte Carlo不确定度分析的产品碳足迹评价数据质量分析模型.首先通过敏感度分析识别出产品碳足迹评价中的主要数据,再采用DQI-Monte Carlo不确定度分析方法对主要数据进行数据质量判定,甄选出影响评价结果可靠性的关键数据,并由此有针对性地提出数据质量改进意见,从而有效地优化数据收集方案,减少碳足迹评价结果的不确定度.建立的方法应用于我国某塑料软包装印刷企业的印刷前阶段碳足迹评价中. The results of carbon footprint assessment of products depend onthe selection of data types, sources, assessment approaches. The purpose of this study is to develop a new method which is combined DOI-Monte Carlo with sensitivity analysis and data quality analysis method for carbon footprint assessment of products. For this new approach, firstly, the primary data impacting on the assessment result were chosen through data sensitivity analysis; then, with DOI-Monte Carlo analysis the uncertainty of the primary data and the key data that affect the evaluation results were obtained. As a result, the accuracy of carbon footprint assessment could be improved more specific by optimizing data collection scheme according to the above data analysis method. As a case study, the developed method was applied to the carbon footprint assessment in the pre-printing stage of one plastic flexible packaging printing company in China. This approach can be used for carbon footprint assessment of many products by improving the uncertainty and data quality.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期1067-1072,共6页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家"十二五"科技支撑项目(2011BAC04B03)
关键词 碳足迹 数据质量分析 不确定度 敏感度 数据优化 carbon footprint assessment of products data quality analysis uncertainty sensitivity data optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1白璐,孙启宏,乔琦.生命周期评价在国内的研究进展评述[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(5):2553-2555. 被引量:15
  • 2Hung Ming-Lung, Ma Hwong-wen. Quantifying system uncertainty of life cycle assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009,14(1): 19-27.
  • 3Arjan de Koning, Diederik Schowanek, Joost Dewaele, et al. Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result [J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010,15(1):79- 89.
  • 4Christopher Frey H, Sachin Bammi. Quantification of variability and uncertainty in lawn and garden equipment NOx and total hydrocarbon emission factors [J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2002,52(4):435-448.
  • 5夏添,邓超,吴军.生命周期评价清单分析的算法研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2005,26(7):1681-1683. 被引量:14
  • 6莫华,张天柱.生命周期清单分析的数据质量评价[J].环境科学研究,2003,16(5):55-58. 被引量:33
  • 7Berners-Lee M, Howard D C, Moss J, et al. Greenhouse gas foottprinting for small business-The use of input-output data [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2011,409(5):883-891.
  • 8Lo Shih-Chi, Ma Hwong-wen, Lo Shang-Lien. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Mote Carlo method [J]. Sicence of The Total Environment, 2005, 340(1-3):23-33.
  • 9任丽娟,陈莎,张菁菁,刘尊文,曹磊,岳文淙,王道.生命周期评价中清单的不确定性分析[J].安全与环境学报,2010,10(1):118-121. 被引量:9
  • 10向东,段广洪,汪劲松.产品全生命周期分析中的数据处理方法[J].计算机集成制造系统-CIMS,2002,8(2):150-154. 被引量:13

二级参考文献128

共引文献367

同被引文献79

引证文献11

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部