期刊文献+

飞机战伤抢修性评价框架研究 被引量:1

Evaluative Frame for the Combat Resilience of Aircraft
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 面对具有高度不确定性因素的飞机战伤抢修性评价问题,借鉴现有评价框架的优点,尽量克服其局限性,并从多种评价方法角度对飞机抢修性评价问题进行综合考虑,提出了一套较为合理、全面、稳妥的飞机战伤抢修性评价框架,满足了不同决策的需求,提高了抢修性评价结果的可信度。 The evaluation for the combat resilience of aircraft is affected by very uncertain factors, this pa- per benefits from the virtues of known evaluative frame and overcomes strugglingly the localization of known evaluative frames. Then, it considers synthetically the evaluation for the combat resilience of aircraft from multi-evaluations. Finally, it puts forward an evaluative frame for the combat resilience of aircraft which is reasonable, general and reliable. This evaluative frame meets different decision-making demands and en- hances the reliability for the evaluative result of combat resilience.
机构地区 中国人民解放军
出处 《四川兵工学报》 CAS 2014年第4期62-64,共3页 Journal of Sichuan Ordnance
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(50535010)
关键词 飞机战伤抢修 抢修性 评价框架 可信度 aircraft battle damage repair combat resilience evaluative frame reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Stalcup B J. The need for combat resilience [ J ]. Proceed- ings Annual R&M Symposium, 1986:489 - 493.
  • 2Stalcup B J. Airland battle 2001 - design for combat resili- ence[J]. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposi- um, 1988 : 14 - 18.
  • 3Kovatch D H. Modelling aircraft combat damage repair[ J]. Proceedings Annual R&M Symposium, 1984:440 - 445.
  • 4Hess J W. Aircraft battle damage repair [ J ]. Aerospace A- merica, 1992:5 - 9.
  • 5Evans M. Battlefield recovery and repair the soviet approach [ J ]. International Defense Review, 1989 : 30 - 34.
  • 6Weisenbach M, Bennett G. Aircraft battle damage repair es- timating procedures and effectiveness impacts[ J]. Aeronau- tical Systems ,AIAA - 2689,1986 : 19 - 24.
  • 7Sebolka J. Enhance system test & evaluation from develop- ment to battlefield via technologies integretion with mainte- nance test and training [ J ]. Aeronautical Systems, 1999 : 22 - 26.
  • 8Saatv T L. The analytic hierarchy process [ M ]. New York : Graw-Hill, 1980 : 14 - 19.
  • 9侯满义,李曙林.一种军用飞机战伤抢修性评价体系[J].航空维修与工程,2006(2):27-29. 被引量:7
  • 10肖明清,陈希林,许明.提高军用ATE战时保障能力的一些技术途径[J].测试技术学报,2007,21(2):149-155. 被引量:8

二级参考文献28

  • 1饶秋生 ,韩云涛 ,宋华文 .信息化战争空军航空装备保障探析[J].装备指挥技术学院学报,2004,15(6):5-9. 被引量:7
  • 2于劲松,李行善.下一代自动测试系统体系结构与关键技术[J].计算机测量与控制,2005,13(1):1-3. 被引量:92
  • 3王学奇,肖明清,陈希林,赖根.基于XML的测试需求描述及其实现[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,41(23):112-114. 被引量:12
  • 4乔中涛,冯振声.基于开放系统的远程自动测试系统设计与实现[J].测试技术学报,2005,19(2):176-180. 被引量:6
  • 5李建平.装备战场抢修理论与应用[M].兵器工业出版社,2000..
  • 6Stalcup B J.The Need for Combat Resilience[A].IEEE.Proceedings Annual R&M Symposium[C].USA:IEEE,1986,489-493.
  • 7Jim Sebolka.Enhance System Test & Evaluation from Development to Battlefield via Technologies Integration with Maintenance Test and Training[DB/OL].1999-10-20[2005-6-12].http://www.militaryusa.com//pub/battlefield.html.
  • 8MIL-M-63003(TM).Technical.Manual:Battled Damage Assessment Preparation[S].USA Army,1985.
  • 9Berkowitz D L.Battlefield damage assessment and repair:live firing trials-1987[C]//IEEE Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.USA:IEEE,1988.170-177.
  • 10McDowell H Clay.BDAR (Battlefield Damage Assessment and Repair) Live-Firing Trials at Meppen[C]//IEEE Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.USA:IEEE,1987:81-85.

共引文献12

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部