期刊文献+

脉冲射频术治疗老年人颈源性头痛的临床疗效分析 被引量:8

THE EFFICACY OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE OF THE ELDERLY
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析颈2脊神经节脉冲射频术治疗老年人颈源性头痛的临床疗效.方法;将56例60岁以上的颈源性头痛患者随机分成两组:颈2脊神经节脉冲射频治疗组(Ⅰ组),颈2脊神经节阻滞治疗组(Ⅱ组),各28例,随访12个月,对两组患者术前和术后1、3d,1周,1、3、6、12个月的疼痛程度数字评分(NRS)和颈部活动度结果(ROM)进行比较.结果:两组患者术后NRS和ROM均较术前明显改善(P<0.05),术后12个月NRS Ⅰ组下降至(4.1±0.9),Ⅱ组下降至(5.0±1.1);ROM Ⅰ组下降至(1.9±0.9),Ⅱ组下降至(2.5±1.0),Ⅰ组疗效明显优于Ⅱ组,存在统计学意义(P<0.05).全部患者无神经及动脉损伤和感染等并发症发生.结论:颈2脊神经节脉冲射频术治疗老年人颈源性头痛疗效显著,安全可靠. Objective:To analyse the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency applied to C2 dorsal root ganglion for the treatment of cervicogenic headache of the elderly.Methods:56 cases of over 60 years old with cervicogenic headache were randomly divided into pulsed radiofrequency treatment group (Group I) and nerve block treatment group (Group Ⅱ).Both groups had 28 patients.All cases were followed up for 12 months and the patients' headaches were evaluated by numerical rating scale (NRS),together with the and range of motion (ROM) of neck before treatment and 1 d,3 d,1 week,1,3,6 and 12 months after treatment.Results:The average NRS scores and ROM scores of all the patients were decreased significantly after the treatment.12 months after operation NRS decreased to (4.1 ±0.9) and (5.0±1.1) in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ respectively.ROM decreased to (1.9±0.9) and (2.5±1.0) in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ respectively.There was a better curative effect of Group Ⅰ with fewer complications such as nerve and arterial injury or infections than Group Ⅱ (P < 0.05).Conclusion:It is effect,safe and reliable to apply pulsed radiofrequency to C2 dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of cervicogenic headache of the elderly.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期155-159,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
基金 南京军区医药卫生科研资助项目(11MA0028)
关键词 颈源性头痛 颈2脊神经节 脉冲射频 老年人 Cervicogenic headache C2 dorsal root ganglia Pulsed electrical stimulation old people
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献62

  • 1吴建波.中西医结合治疗颈源性头痛35例[J].人民军医,2008,51(12). 被引量:1
  • 2马超,曾海辉,伍少玲,肖秀红,黄利荣,燕铁斌.颈2横突局部注射配合直线偏振光近红外线治疗颈源性头痛的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2005,27(11):681-683. 被引量:25
  • 3姜永庆,董大明,陈立民,刘庆鹏.颈源性头痛的射频和松解的有效性观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2007,13(1):60-61. 被引量:8
  • 4Antonaci F,Sjaastad O.Cervicogenic headache:a real headache.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2011,11(2):149-155.
  • 5Paemeleire K,Bartsch T.Occipital nerve stimulation for headache disorders.Neurotherapeutics,2010,7(2):213-219.
  • 6Antonaci F,Fredriksen TA,Sjaastad O.Cervicogenic headache:clinical presentation,diagnostic criteria,and differential diagnosis.Curr Pain Headache Rep,2001,5(4):387-392.
  • 7Bilge O.An anatomic and morphometric study of C2 nerve root ganglion and its corresponding foramen.Spine (Fhila Pa 1976),2004,29(5):495-499.
  • 8Malik K,Benzon HT.Radiofrequencr applications to dorsal root ganglia:a literature review.Anesthesiology,2008,109(3):527-542.
  • 9Malik K,Benzon HT.Radiofrequencr applications to dorsal root ganglia:a literature review.Anesthesiology,2008,109(3):527-542.
  • 10Mehio AK,Shah SK. Alleviating head and neck pain[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am,2009,42(1):143-159.

共引文献73

同被引文献74

引证文献8

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部