期刊文献+

汉英双语者语义饱和效应研究 被引量:5

On the semantic satiation of Chinese-English bilinguals
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究采用语义启动范式和类别判断任务,考察汉英双语者在语义加工中的饱和效应。结果表明:1)汉英双语者在母语语义加工中表现出稳定的饱和效应;2)汉英双语者在二语语义加工中未出现饱和效应,但饱和处理对二语熟练程度不同的双语者的语义加工有不同影响:促进不熟练双语者对二语的语义通达,不影响熟练双语者对二语的语义通达;3)汉英双语者在跨语言语义加工中未出现饱和效应。在英-汉转换情境下,饱和处理对双语者的语义加工没有影响;在汉-英转换情境下,饱和处理对二语熟练程度不同的双语者的语义加工有不同影响:促进不熟练双语者的语义加工,阻碍熟练双语者的语义加工。研究结果支持语义饱和效应发生在词形与语义联接阶段的理论。 The semantic priming paradigm and category judgment task were used to investigate the semantic satiation of intra-and inter-language of Chinese-English bilinguals.The results show that(1)the semantic satiation effect of the first language is stable;(2)for Chinese-English bilinguals, overly repeated words do not trigger semantic satiation under total second language circumstances;(3)semantic satiation doesnt exist in any cross-language semantic processing conditions for Chinese-English bilinguals;however,under Chinese-to-English circumstances,the influence from overly repeated cues is also regulated by the bilingualsproficiency on the second language:over repetition inhibits the semantic processing for proficient bilinguals but facilitates the lessproficient.The results of this study support the theory that the semantic satiation is a loss of association between the lexical items and meanings.
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期423-434,481,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“隐喻的认知/脑机制及对汉语讲话者认知的影响--子课题1”(14XNLQ05)的成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Balota, D. & S. Black. 1997. Semantic satiation in healthy young and older adults [J]. Mem- ory and Cognition 25: 190-202.
  • 2Black, S. 2001. Semantic satiation and lexical ambiguity resolution [J]. The American Journal of Psychology 114.. 493-510.
  • 3Cheng, C. &Y. Lan. 2011. An implicit test of Chinese orthographic satiation [J]. Reading and Writing 24: 55-90.
  • 4Cheng, C. & S. Lin. 2013. Chinese orthographic decomposition and logographic structure [J]. Reading and Writing 26: 1111-1131.
  • 5Cheng, C. &S. Wu. 1994. Orthographic satiation in Chinese [A]. In H. Chang, J. Huang, C. Hue &O. Tzeng (eds.). Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing [C]. Taipei.. Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University. 1-30.
  • 6Collins, A. & E. Loftus. 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing [J]. Psy- chological Review 82: 407-428.
  • 7Esposito, N. & L. Pelton. 1971. Review of the measurement of semantic satiation [J]. Psy- chological Bulletin 75.. 330-346.
  • 8Frenck-Mestre, C. &J. Pynte. 1997. Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages [J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A: 119-148.
  • 9Huber, D. & R. O'Reilly. 2003. Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms.. Temporal segregation through synaptic depression [J]. Cognitive Science 27.. 403-430.
  • 10Huber, D., X. Tian, T. Curran, R. O'Reilly&B. Woroch. 2008. The dynamics of integra- tion and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 349.. 1389-1416.

二级参考文献37

  • 1张积家,彭聃龄.汉字词特征语义提取的实验研究[J].心理学报,1993,25(2):140-147. 被引量:44
  • 2张积家,陈新葵.汉字义符在汉语动作动词意义认知中的作用[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):434-441. 被引量:40
  • 3张积家,方燕红,陈新葵.义符在中文名词和动词分类中的作用[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):159-169. 被引量:36
  • 4Allport, A., Strles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set : Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV.. Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • 5Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. A. (1975). A spreading - activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
  • 6Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Hailer, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud : Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
  • 7Costa, C., & Mikel, S. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production : Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491-511.
  • 8Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Iva, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process ? Inhibitory and Language - Specific Selection Mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1057-1074.
  • 9Dijkstra, A. T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In J. Grainger, A. Jacobs (Eds.). Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (.pp. 189-225). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • 10Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task - switching paradigm : Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 468-483.

共引文献45

同被引文献29

  • 1李大遂.汉字表义偏旁形成发展与造字法演进[J].汉字文化,2004(4):50-53. 被引量:4
  • 2张金桥,王燕.韩国、印尼留学生汉字识别中形音义的激活[J].心理学探新,2010,30(6):36-44. 被引量:14
  • 3刘强,陈安涛,王琪,周柳,孙弘进.知觉加工中存在颜色类别知觉效应的证据[J].心理学报,2008,40(1):8-13. 被引量:12
  • 4李小华.(2013).汉语形声字词汇的联结语逻鲍和戏砬探索.暨南大学硕士学位论文.
  • 5彭聃龄,丁国盛,王春茂,Taft,朱晓平.(1999).汉语逆序词的加工一一词素在词加工中的作用.心理学报.31(1):36-46.
  • 6许乐山.(2012).探索中文语意足现象的性质.成功大学博士学位论文.
  • 7Black, S. R. (2001). Semantic satiation and lexical ambiguity resolution. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 493- 510.
  • 8Cheng, C. M., & Wu, S. J. (1994). Orthographic satiation and disorganization in Chinese.Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing, 1, 1-30.
  • 9Cheng, C. M., & Lan, Y. H. (2011). An implicit test of Chinese orthographic satiation. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 55-90.
  • 10Esposito, N. J., & Pehon, L. H. (1971). Review of the measument of semantic satiation. Psychological Bulletin, 75(5), 330-346.

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部