期刊文献+

外耳道高负压引流联合洛美沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的临床观察 被引量:3

Clinical observation on high suction drainage canal combined with lomefloxacin in treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察外耳道高负压引流联合洛美沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的临床效果。方法将90例慢性化脓性中耳炎(单纯型)患者随机分为2组,观察组采用耳窥镜下外耳道高负压引流,同时联合洛美沙星滴耳液治疗,对照组只采用外耳道负压引流,比较两组患者临床疗效、致病菌清除率、听力改善情况。结果观察组患者总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组的66.67%(P<0.05);观察组致病菌清除率为86.67%,明显高于对照组的60%(P<0.05);观察组听力改善率为95.56%,明显高于对照组的82.22%(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为17.77%,明显低于对照组的24.44%(P<0.05)。结论外耳道高负压引流联合洛美沙星用于单纯型慢性化脓性中耳炎的治疗,可提高临床疗效,改善听力情况,减少不良反应,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of high suction drainage canal combined with lomefloxacin in treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media. Methods 90 chronic suppurative otitis media patients were randomly divided into two groups,observation group received high suction drainage canal combined with lomefloxacin under ear speculum,and control group only received high suction drainage canal. The clinical efficacy,pathogen clearance,listening improvement on of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 93. 33%,which was significantly higher than that of control group(66. 67%)(P &lt; 0. 05). Pathogen clearance rate was 86. 67% in observation group,significantly higher than that in control group(60%)( P &lt; 0. 05). Hearing improvement was 95. 56% in observation group,significantly higher than that in control group(82. 22%)( P &lt; 0. 05).Incidence of adverse reactions was 17. 77% in observation group,significantly lower than that in control group(24.44%)(P &lt;0.05). Conclusion High suction drainage canal combined with lomefloxacin can improve clinical outcomes,improve hearing,reduce adverse reactions for chronic suppurative otitis media,it is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《实用药物与临床》 CAS 2014年第5期629-631,共3页 Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies
关键词 外耳道高负压引流 洛美沙星 慢性化脓性中耳炎 耳内窥镜 High suction drainage canal Lomefloxacin Chronic suppurative otitis media Ear endoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献64

共引文献97

同被引文献29

  • 1Bjerke-Kroll BT, Sculco PK, Mclawhorn AS, et al. The increased total cost associated with post-operative drains in total hip and knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014,29 (5) : 895-899.
  • 2Kosins AM, Scholz T, Cetinkaya M, et al. Evidence-based value of subcutaneous surgical wound drainage: the largest systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013,132(2) :443-450.
  • 3Parker M J, Roberts CP, Hay D. Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004,86-A(6) : 1146-1152.
  • 4Jenny JY, Boeri C, Lafare S. No drainage does not increase complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation: a prospective, comparative, randomized study [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2001,9 (5) : 299-301.
  • 5Keska R, Paradowski TP, Witonski D. Outcome in primary cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without drain: A prospective comparative study [J]. Indian J Orthop, 2014,48 (4) :404-409.
  • 6Erceg M, Becic K. Postoperative closed suction drainage following hip and knee aloarthroplasty: drain removal after 24 or after 48 hours? [J]. Lijec Vjesn, 2008,130(5-6):133-135.
  • 7Schollin-Borg M, Michaelsson K, Rahme H. Presentation, outcome, and cause of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a case control study [ J ]. Arthroscopy, 2003,19(9) : 941-947.
  • 8Indelli PF, Dillingham M, Fanton G, et al. Septic arthritis in postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002(398): 182-188.
  • 9张晓彤,张青,任晓勇,张全安,许珉,杨华荣,李宗芳.慢性化脓性中耳炎的治疗[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2008,15(5):293-295. 被引量:13
  • 10黄刚.盐酸洛美沙星联合头孢拉定治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的临床治疗分析[J].中国医药指南,2010,8(9):14-15. 被引量:5

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部