期刊文献+

同源宾语构式对动词论元结构的增容:认知语法视角 被引量:7

On Augmentation of Argument Structures of Verbs by Cognate Object Construction:A Cognitive Grammar Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 同源宾语是动词的论元而不是附属语。同源宾语构式表示某人做某事情,其论元结构包括施事和同源客体,分别映射为主语和宾语。同源宾语构式将动词所表示的过程的每一个状态同时激活,通过总体扫瞄识解为一个整体,然后加以凸显并物化同源客体。动词和同源宾语共享同一事件,但动词凸显事件的过程,而同源宾语凸显事件的整体状态。 The cognate object is the argument of the verb rather than its adjunct. Its construction means that someone does a certain thing and its argument structure encompasses agent and cognate theme, which are mapped into subject and object respectively. Its construction evokes simultaneously every state of the process expressed by its verb, construes them into a whole via summary scanning, and then makes it salient and reifies it into a cognate theme. The verb in the cognate object construction and its cognate theme share the same event, but the verb profiles the process of the event while its cognate theme highlights the holistic state of the event.
作者 许明 董成如
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期37-40,共4页 Foreign Language Education
基金 陕西省社科基金项目"认知语法视角下构式对词项的压制研究"(项目编号:13K092) 国家社科基金项目"构式的论元实现--基于识解的压制研究"(项目编号:11BYY004)的部分研究成果
关键词 同源宾语 总体扫瞄 凸显 cognate object summary scanning salience
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Macfarland, T. Cognate objects and the argument/adjunct distinction in English[D]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northwestern University, 1995.
  • 2Mittwoch, A. Hebrew Cognate Obits[ M ]. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1993.
  • 3Goldberg, A. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 4Golclberg, A. Constructuions: A Constructiorud Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.
  • 5Burzio, L. Italian Syraaz: A Government-Binding Approach [ M ]. Dordrecht: Reidd, 1986.
  • 6刘爱英.论英语同源宾语的句法地位与允准[J].外语教学与研究,2012,44(2):173-184. 被引量:8
  • 7高华,金苏扬.无格的同源宾语——最简方案内特征核查得出的结论[J].外语与外语教学,2000(6):62-64. 被引量:20
  • 8Jones, M. Cognate objects and the case-filler[J]. Jorunal of Linguistics, 1968(24) :89-110.
  • 9Levin, B & M. Rappaport Hovav. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface[M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995.
  • 10Massam, D. Co,hate objects as thematic objects[J]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 1990(35) :161-190.

二级参考文献33

  • 1梁锦祥.英语的同源宾语结构和及物化宾语结构[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(4):23-29. 被引量:31
  • 2高华,金苏扬.无格的同源宾语——最简方案内特征核查得出的结论[J].外语与外语教学,2000(6):62-64. 被引量:20
  • 3Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-binding Approach [M]. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht. Foris.
  • 5Horita, Y. 1996. English cognate object constructions and their transitivity [J]. English Linguistics 13: 221-247.
  • 6Huddleston, R. & G. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Jones, M. 1988. Cognate objects and the case-filter[J].Journal of Linguistics 24: 89-110.
  • 8Keyser, S. & T. Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-416.
  • 9Koopman, H. &D. Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects [J]. Lingua 85. 211-258.
  • 10Kuno, S. &K. Takami. 2004. Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the Unergative-Unaccusative Distinction [M]. Amsterdam. John Benjamins.

共引文献23

同被引文献75

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部