期刊文献+

明朝颁历朝鲜及其影响 被引量:9

The Ming Government's Conferring Almanacs to Korea and Its Influence
原文传递
导出
摘要 东亚"朝贡体系"之中,明朝对藩属国颁历授时,是其履行宗主国权力的重要体现。明朝对高丽/朝鲜的颁历关系,始自洪武初年,到永乐初年才形成定制。朝鲜使者每年岁末兼行奉咨请历,明廷赐给王历一本,民历一百本,由使者赍回。若不及领取,明朝也会遣使颁历。朝鲜王朝在遵奉明朝正朔的同时,国内自印小历敷用,存在二历并行的局面。有时,所造之历甚至流传回中国。朝鲜王朝谨防此违制之举被发现,常审慎对待明使。明廷颁降之《大统历》在朝鲜王朝具有权威地位,李氏君臣常据之考校本国历日正误,据之择吉行事,还据之修订本国历注。入清以后,在朝鲜王朝"尊周思明"的语境中,明朝颁历之举还体现出深远的后续影响。 The Ming government conferred almanacs to some subordinated kingdoms including Korea, reflected one of the most important aspect on the execution of suzerainty. The relationship of conferring almanacs between the Ming and Korea began in the reign of Hongwu and became definitive system in the reign of Yongle. Every year, the Ming government conferred one almanac for prince and 100 almanacs for common people to Korea. Some Korean emissaries had the task of asking the Ming government for almanacs. Occasionally, the Ming government sent an emissary to conferr almanacs to Korea. Korea accepted almanacs from the Ming government, but they also printed their own almanacs without the Ming government' s permission, so they tried to prevent Ming emissaries from finding this violation. Sometimes, the Korean almanacs even reached China. The almanacs based on Datong Calendar conferred by the Ming government played an important role in Korean calendar affairs. According to the Ming almanacs, Korean government often corrected the mistakes in the their almanacs, made divinations, revised annotation in their almanacs. In the context of revering the Zhou and longing for the Ming when Korea became subordinated kingdoms of the Qing, the conferring almanacs tradition of the Ming government still had an great influence.
作者 汪小虎
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期55-68,共14页 Journal of Historical Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"中外科学文化交流历史文献整理与研究"(10&ZD063) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"中华帝国后期的时间管理--明清时代之颁历制度研究"(13YJC770044)的阶段性成果
关键词 明朝 颁历 朝鲜 历书(历日) 《大统历》 Ming government conferring almanac Korea almanac almanacs based on Datong Calendar
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1崔演.《西征记》卷三《新历三首》,燕行录全集第3册,首尔:东国大学校出版部2001年影印本,第251页.
  • 2韦兵.星占、历法与宋夏关系[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(4):37-42. 被引量:6
  • 3郑士龙.《湖阴杂稿》卷二《朝谒》,韩国文集中的明代史料第2册,第467页.
  • 4孙卫国.《从正朔看朝鲜王朝尊明反清的文化心态》、《大明旗号与小中华意识——朝鲜王朝尊周思明问题研究(1637-1800)》.
  • 5权裰.《冲斋集》卷七《朝天录》,韩国文集中的明代史料第2册,广西师范大学出版社2006年影印本,第183-196页.
  • 6申悦道.《懒斋先生文集》卷三,韩国文集丛刊第24册,首尔:景仁文化社1996年影印本,第58页.
  • 7韦兵.竞争与认同:从历日颁赐、历法之争看宋与周边民族政权的关系[J].民族研究,2008(5):74-82. 被引量:12
  • 8万历·《大明会典》卷八一《礼部三十九·祠祭清吏司》,续修四库全书第790册,上海古籍出版社2003年影印本,第434页.
  • 9张升.明代朝鲜的求书[J].文献,1996(4):140-151. 被引量:5
  • 10汪小虎.敦煌具注历日中的昼夜时刻问题[J].自然科学史研究,2013,32(2):129-139. 被引量:6

二级参考文献253

同被引文献85

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部