摘要
在左翼作家对民族主义文艺运动的批判中 ,茅盾对民族主义文艺理论的批判是他的独特贡献 ,有较高的理论价值。民族主义文艺理论由作为理论基础的两个命题和一个基本文艺主张组成。两个命题是 :第一 ,文艺原本是表现民族意识的 ;第二 ,近代是民族主义文艺时代。一个基本文艺主张是 ,要创造以民族意识为“中心意识”的民族主义文艺。茅盾通过概念的澄清和具体实例的剖析批驳了民族主义文艺理论的两个命题 ,然后又结合政治现实的分析 ,指出了国民党文人的民族主义文艺主张的欺骗性和反动性。就当时的情况而言 。
Mao Dun's criticism of the nationalist literary theory, which is highly valuable, is a great contribution to the criticism of nationalist literary movement of the left-wing authors. There are two judgements and a suggestion.The former two are, 1) literature is something representing the sense of nationalism and 2) pre-modern times is the age of nationalist literary theory. The latter suggests that the sense of nationalism should become the core as the basic concept of the nationalist literary theory. However, Mao Dun rebutted the above by clarifying the concept and analyzing with actual facts. With his analysis and attachment of political reality, he points out that the right-wing authors' nationalist literary theory is something deceptive and counter-revolutionary. Mao Dun's criticism was proper at that moment.
出处
《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第4期42-48,共7页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
