摘要
基于财政部政府与社会资本合作中心(China public private partnerships center,CPPPC)项目库数据,以各省生态PPP项目、重大项目以及国有企业参与程度的差异性为研究对象,探究省际差异的特征及影响因素。结果表明:生态PPP项目主要集中在西部欠发达地区,重大项目主要集中在东部发达地区,国企在社会投资群体中处于主导地位。进一步分析发现:生态PPP项目立项受GDP增长速度、人均财政收入、地方债务占GDP比重、受教育水平及自然资源因素影响;重大项目立项除受上述因素影响外,还受地方政府效率影响;国有企业参与积极性受地方债务占GDP比重、政府效率和自然资源因素影响。结合分析提出如下建议:政府应避免将政府与社会资本合作(Public private partnership,PPP)模式当成单纯的融资工具,需要提高政府效率,优化项目质量,发挥PPP模式最大效用,服务生态建设。
Based on the data from the CPPPC( China public private partnerships center),taking the differences of ecological projects,major projects and the of participation of state-owned enterprises in provinces as research objects,the interprovincial differences and its impacts have been discussed.The results show that the ecological projects are mainly concentrated in the underdeveloped western areas,while the major projects are mainly in the developed eastern areas.Moreover,the state-owned enterprises dominate social investment groups.Furthermore,the ecological projects are affected by GDP growth rate,fiscal revenue per capita,ratio of local debt to GDP,education and natural resources.The major projects are also affected by the efficiency of local governments in addition.The participation of state-owned enterprises is affected by the ratio of local debt to GDP,the efficiency of government and natural resources.According to the results,it is considered that the government should avoid using PPP as a purely financing tool,but need to improve the government efficiency,optimize project quality,maximize the effectiveness of PPP mode,and serve ecological construction.
作者
王文彬
唐德善
WANG Wenbin;TANG Deshan(Business School,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;School of Management and Economics,North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Zhengzhou 450046,China;College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China)
出处
《干旱区资源与环境》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第1期9-16,共8页
Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(16BJY026)资助
关键词
生态PPP项目
省际差异
CPPPC
政府效率
ecological PPP project
interprovincial differences
CPPPC
government efficiency
