期刊文献+

大动脉狭窄脑梗死患者介入术与常规溶栓治疗临床效果的对比 被引量:5

Comparative Clinical Efficacy of Interventional and Conventional Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients with Cerebral Infarction with Large Artery Stenosis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比大动脉狭窄脑梗死患者应用介入术以及常规溶栓治疗的实际效果。方法选择2016年8月~2017年8月间在我院进行治疗的大动脉狭窄脑梗死患者共60例作为研究分析对象,使用随机数字法,将所有患者分为观察组、对照组两组,对照组进行常规静脉溶栓治疗,观察组在对照组的治疗基础上联合支架取栓介入术进行治疗,将两组患者的治疗总有效率、NIHSS评分改善率、mRS评分神经功能良好率、并发症出现情况以及患者死亡率进行对比。结果在治疗总有效率方面,观察组明显高于对照组(P <0.05);在NIHSS评分改善率、mRS评分神经功能良好率方面,观察组明显优于对照组(P <0.05);在并发症出现情况方面,观察组明显低于对照组(P <0.05);在患者死亡率方面,观察组明显低于对照组(P <0.05)。结论在治疗大动脉狭窄脑梗死患者中,应用静脉溶栓联合支架取栓介入术治疗的效果较为显著,出现并发症较少,安全性更高。 Objective To comparative clinical efficacy of interventional therapy and conventional thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of cerebral infarction patients with aortic stenosis.Methods A total of 60 patients with aortic stenosis and cerebral infarction who were treated in our hospital between August 2016 and August 2017 were selected as subjects for study analysis.All patients were divided into observation group and control group by random number method.The control group received conventional intravenous thrombolytic therapy.The observation group was treated with stent thrombectomy intervention based on the treatment of the control group.The total treatment efficiency,NIHSS score improvement rate,mRS score neurological function good rate,and complications of the two groups were evaluated.And patient mortality was compared.Results The total effective rate of treatment was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P <0.05 ).The NIHSS score improvement rate and the mRS score neurological function rate were significantly better in the observation group than in the control group (P <0.05 ).The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P <0.05 ).In terms of patient mortality,the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (<0.05 ).Conclusion In the treatment of cerebral infarction with large artery stenosis,the use of intravenous thrombolytic therapy combined with stent thrombectomy intervention has a significant effect with fewer complications,higher safety.
作者 胡杨真 HU Yang-zhen(Guangdong Qingyuan People's Hospital,Qingyuan ,511500,China)
出处 《血栓与止血学》 2018年第6期909-911,共3页 Chinese Journal of Thrombosis and Hemostasis
关键词 大动脉狭窄 脑梗死 支架取栓介入术 常规静脉溶栓 Aortic stenosis Cerebral infarction Stent thrombectomy Conventional intravenous thrombolysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1韩阅,贾建平,周爱红.初次发病的腔隙性脑梗死患者的认知变化特点[J].首都医科大学学报,2010,31(2):154-159. 被引量:13
  • 2郭艳,蒋超.MoCA和MMSE量表在脑小血管病性认知障碍中的应用比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(4):897-898. 被引量:25
  • 3中华医学会神经外科分会,中国医师协会神经外科分会,中国医师协会神经内科分会.介入神经放射诊断治疗规范Ⅲ(修订稿)[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2005,2(10):476-480. 被引量:74
  • 4各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33091
  • 5Lund RW. Lacunar infarction, mortality over time and mortality relative to other ischemic strokes[J]. J Insur Med, 2014, 44(1): 32- 37.
  • 6Taguchi A, Miki M, Muto A, et al. Association between oral health and the risk of lacunar infarction in Japanese adults[J]. Gerontology, 2013, 59(6): 499-506. DOI: 10.1159/000353707.
  • 7Rajapakse A, Rajapakse S, Sharma JC. Is investigating for carotid artery disease warranted in non-cortical lacunar infarction?[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(1): 217-220. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA. 110. 600064.
  • 8Gorelick PB, Pantoni L. Advances in vascular cognitive impairment [J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(2): 307-308. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA. 111. 000219.
  • 9Kwan MW, Mak W, Cheung RT, et al. Ischemic stroke related to intracranial branch atheromatous disease and comparison with large and small arterydiseases[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2011,303(1/2): 80- 84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.01.008.
  • 10Araki Y, Kumakura H, Kanai H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cerebral infarction and carotid artery stenosis in peripheral arterial disease[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2012, 223(2): 473-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.05.019.

共引文献111

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部