期刊文献+

手助腹腔镜与开腹低位直肠癌切除术疗效观察 被引量:7

Comparison of clinical outcomes between open and hand-assisted laparoscopic operations for lower rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨手助腹腔镜全系膜切除术((total mesorectal excision,TME)在低位直肠癌手术中的可行性及安全性。方法行手助腹腔镜下全系膜切除术的46例低位直肠癌患者为手助腹腔镜组,行开腹全系膜切除术的53例低位直肠癌患者为开腹组,比较2组术中出血量、手术时间、术后短期并发症发生率、淋巴结清除数量、保肛率等。结果手助腹腔镜组无中转开腹病例;手助腹腔镜组保肛率(91.3%)高于开腹组(73.6%)(P<0.05),手术时间((131±29)min)长于开腹组((109±35)min)(P<0.05),术中出血量、术后短期并发症发生率、住院时间((58±23)mL、21.7%、7.4d)少于开腹组((130±67)mL、27.1%、9.2d)(P<0.05),清扫淋巴结数目((15.3±6.9)个)与开腹组((14.5±5.8)个)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论手助腹腔镜TME治疗低位直肠癌与开腹手术效果相当,可提高术中显露与保肛率,降低术后短期并发症发生率。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hand-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low rectal cancer. Methods The blood loss volume, operation lasting time (131 ± 29) minutes, incidence of short-term complications after operation, number of dissected lymph nodes and anus preservation were compared between 46 patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic TME and 53 patients undergoing open TME for low rectal cancer. Results No conversion occurred in hand-assisted laparoscopic group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic group had longer operation lasting time (131±29) minutes, higher anal preservation rate (91.3%), less blood loss (58±23)mL, lower incidence of postoperative complications (21. 7%) and shorter hospitalization duration (7. 4 days) than that in open surgery group ((109±35) minutes, 73.6%, (130±67) mL,27. 1%, 9.2 days) (P〈0.05). There was no signficant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes between two groups (15. 3± 6. 9, 14. 5±5. 8) (P〉0.05). Conclusions Hand-assisted laparoscopie TME has the similar syrgerieal outcome with open TME, but it can improve anus preservation rate and reduce the incidence of short-term complications after operation.
作者 袁远
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2014年第7期703-704,共2页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
关键词 低位直肠癌 手助腹腔镜 全直肠系膜切除 Low rectal cancer hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery total mesorectal excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1Abdul-Wahed Nasir Meshikhes.Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(45):5662-5668. 被引量:24
  • 2周光荣,刘卫东,赵耀,王泰岳,于仁,孙跃明.腹腔镜结肠直肠癌切除术[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(2):114-115. 被引量:3
  • 3俞金龙,黄宗海,吴爱国,陈海金,范应方.直接手助腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治的疗效比较[J].世界华人消化杂志,2007,15(15):1769-1771. 被引量:7
  • 4Aalbers A G, Biere S S, van Berge Henegouwen M I, et al. Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta analysis [J]. Surg Endosc,2008,22(8) : 1769-1780.
  • 5Osarogiagbon R U, Ogbeide O, Ogbeide E, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy compared with open colectomy in a nontertiary care setting[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2007,6 (8) : 588-592.
  • 6Ringley C, Lee Y K, Iqbal A, et al. Comparison of conventional laparoscopic and hand-assisted oncologic segmental colonic resection[J]. Surg Endosc,2007,21(12) :2137-2141.
  • 7Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients [J]. Ann Surg,2003,237(3):335-342.
  • 8Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF,et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer:a prospective randomized trial[ J]. Ann Surg 0ncol,2008,15 (9) :2418-2425.
  • 9Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer:a prospective compara- tive study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19 ( 11 ) : 1460-1467.
  • 10Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopie vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2004,18 ( 8 ) : 1211-1215.

共引文献73

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部