期刊文献+

经皮内镜椎板间入路微创治疗游离脱垂型L_5~S_1椎间盘突出症 被引量:24

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for prolapsed and sequestrated L_5-S_1 lumbar disc herniation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经皮内镜椎板间入路微创治疗游离脱垂型L5~S1椎间盘突出症的手术技巧及临床疗效。方法2010年1月至2012年6月,我科采用经皮内镜椎板间入路椎间盘切除术(percutaneousendoscopicinterlaminardiscectomy,PEID)微创治疗游离脱垂型L5~S1椎间盘突出症94例。其中男53例,女41例,年龄13~56(平均29.69)岁。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visualanaloguescale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestrydisabilityindex,ODI)、改良MacNab评价临床疗效。结果平均随访26.5(12~37)个月。平均手术时间(66.4±8.4)min。每台手术术中平均透视时间(0.5±0.2)s。所有患者术后腰腿痛、感觉肌力减退均有不同程度的缓解。术前、术后1天、术后1、3、6、12个月腰痛VAS评分分别为:(5.40±1.12)分,(3.36±0.96)分,(1.86±0.99)分,(1.18±0.83)分,(0.78±0.62)分,(0.58±0.64)分;腿痛VAS评分分别为:(8.40±0.95)分,(2.66±1.53)分,(1.98±1.00)分,(1.20±0.81)分,(0.82±0.66)分,(0.68±0.62)分。术前、术后1、3、6、12个月ODI指数分别为:51.88±8.88,33.22±10.33,23.46±7.47,15.10±5.72,10.38±5.93。术前与术后各时段腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI指数差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。末次随访时改良MacNab评价疗效,优良率94.7%。结论经皮内镜椎板间入路椎间盘切除术微创治疗游离脱垂型L5~S1椎间盘突出症具有创伤小、出血少、术中透视少、术后恢复快等优点,其近期疗效确切,远期结果有待进一步随访。 Objective To investigate the surgical techniques and clinical effects of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy ( PEID ) in the treatment of prolapsed and sequestrated L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation. Methods A total of 94 patients with L5-S1 prolapsed and sequestrated lumbar disc herniation were treated by PEID from January 2010 to June 2012. There were 53 males and 41 females, whose average age was 29.69 years old ( range:13-56 years ). The Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ), Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) and modiifed MacNab criteria were used for the evaluation of clinical effects. Results All the patients were followed up for a mean period of 26.5 months ( range:12-37 months ). The mean operation time was ( 66.4±8.4 ) min. The average intraoperative fluoroscopy time was ( 0.5±0.2 ) s. Sensory disturbance, muscle weakness and low back and leg pain were alleviated in different degrees after the operation in all the patients. The VAS scores of low back pain were ( 5.40±1.12 ), ( 3.36±0.96 ), ( 1.86±0.99 ), ( 1.18±0.83 ), ( 0.78±0.62 ) and ( 0.58±0.64 ) point preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation. The VAS scores of leg pain was ( 8.40±0.95 ), ( 2.66±1.53 ), ( 1.98±1.00 ), ( 1.20±0.81 ), ( 0.82±0.66 ) and ( 0.68±0.62 ) point in the corresponding follow-up time. The ODI scores were 51.88±8.88, 33.22±10.33, 23.46±7.47, 15.10±5.72 and 10.38±5.93 preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation. Statistically signiifcant differences existed in the VAS scores and ODI scores of low back and leg pain preoperatively and in the corresponding follow-up time ( P〈0.01 ). The excellent and good rate was 94.7% in the latest follow-up according to the modiifed MacNab criteria. Conclusions PEID is a safe, effective and minimally invasive procedure in the treatment of prolapsed and sequestrated L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation, with the advantages of less trauma, less blood loss, less intraoperative lfuoroscopy and quick recovery. Its short-term results are satisfactory, while its long-term outcomes require further follow-ups.
出处 《中国骨与关节杂志》 CAS 2014年第8期590-596,共7页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
基金 卫生部行业科研专项基金(201002018)
关键词 椎间盘移位 腰椎 外科手术 微创性 椎间盘切除术 经皮 椎板间入路 Intervertebral disc displacement Lumbar vertebrae Surgical procedures,minimally invasive Diskectomy,percutaneous Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy
  • 相关文献

同被引文献188

引证文献24

二级引证文献244

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部