期刊文献+

颈椎后路减压纳米人工椎板重建颈椎管的疗效分析 被引量:2

Efficacy of posterior cervical decompression laminectomy reconstruction cervical artificial nano-tubes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估应用纳米人工骨重建颈椎椎管的临床疗效。方法对23例行颈椎后路减压人工椎板椎管重建术的患者进行随访。统计手术时间及术中出血量;采用JOA(日本矫形外科学会)评分标准评定患者脊髓神经功能状态;观察轴性症状及颈5神经根麻痹的发生情况;颈椎X线片及CT了解椎管矢状径扩大情况及人工椎板融合情况。结果手术时间平均92 min,术中出血量平均316 ml。人工椎板植入未见排斥反应,术后12月人工骨骨性融合率为45.5%。手术前后颈椎椎管矢状径差异有显著性,椎管矢状径均超过14 mm。JOA评分由术前平均9.6分增加至术后1年时平均15.1分,改善率为74.3%。3例出现轴性症状,理疗治疗后好转;未出现颈5神经根麻痹并发症。结论在颈椎后路减压手术中应用纳米人工椎板重建颈椎管可以获得较好的近期疗效。 Objective To study the effect of nano-artifieial vertebral lamina on posterior decompression and reconstruction of cervical vertebral canal. Methods Retrospective reviews were done in 23 patients who underwent posterior decompression and reconstruction of cervical vertebral canal with nano-artificial vertebral lamina. Operative time and blood loss were recorded. All patients were evaluated by JOA scores,while the incidence of axial symptoms and C5 nerve root palsy were observed. X-ray photography and CT were used to measure the bone fusion and sagittal diameter of cervical vertebral canal. Results The average operation time was 92 min and the bood loss was 316 ml . The clinical symptoms and physical signs were improved in all the patients after operation.JOA scores increased from 9.6 to 15.1 on an average,the improvement rate of JOA scores was 74.3%. There was significant difference in sagittal diameter of each segment vertebral canal between preop- eration and postoperation, and after operation the mean of sagittal diameter of each segment was more than 14 ram. The union rate of artificial vertebral lamina was 45.5% in 1 year.Axial symptoms were observed in 3 cases and no C5 nerve root palsy was found. Conclusion Posterior decompression andreconstruction of cervical vertebral canal with nano-artificial vertebral lamina is safe and effective.
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2014年第5期348-351,共4页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 颈椎管 后路减压 重建 人工椎板 cervical vertebral canal posterior decompression reconstruction artificial vertebrallamina
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献171

共引文献332

同被引文献40

  • 1张国威,林宏生,吴昊,熊廷亮,纪志盛,林宏生.颈前路分段减压植骨融合术治疗老年多节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(2):291-293.
  • 2唐文胜,蒋电明,安洪,李帮春,孟纯阳,肖智博,徐兵,赵波.纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺复合人工椎板预防脊柱后路术后椎管内瘢痕粘连的实验研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(11):675-678. 被引量:23
  • 3Shabani MO,Mazahery A.Artificial intelligence in numerical modeling of nano sized ceramic particulates reinforced metal matrix composites.Appl Math Model.2012;36(11):5455-5465.
  • 4Jiang SD,Jiang LS,Dai LY.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylosis: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2012;132(2):155-161.
  • 5Phillips FM,Lee JY,Geisler FH,et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013;38(15):E907-918.
  • 6Gao Y,Liu M,Li T,et al.A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease.J Bone Joint Surg.2013;95(6):555-561.
  • 7Coric D,Kim PK,Clemente JD,et al.Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(1):36-42.
  • 8Singh K,Phillips FM,Park DK,et al.Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.Spine J.2012;12(5): 372-378.
  • 9韩国伟,刘少喻,梁春祥,于滨生,陈柏龄,张旭华,李浩淼,魏福鑫.羟基磷灰石人工骨在颈椎后路双开门椎管扩大成形治疗中的应用(英文)[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(29):5661-5664. 被引量:4
  • 10李钦亮,刘艺,陈鸣,陈金传,朱赤.颈椎“双开门”椎管扩大成形同种异体骨植骨治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2011,32(4):276-278. 被引量:7

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部