摘要
传统著作权理论认为作品系作者人格之外化或延伸,著作人身权与作者人格无法分离,故其无从转让;我国著作权法对著作人身权转让之规定亦尚付阙如。然社会实践尤其于信息以"裂变"速度传播的互联网络领域,转让著作人身权之现象不时发生,学界于此形成了禁止转让说、自由转让说和限制转让说三种不同理论主张以维护或解构传统著作权理论。但既有学说在解释著作人身权之可转让性问题上则语焉不详,缺乏解释力和说服力。从理论和实践层面论,发表权和修改权具可转让性,而署名权和保护作品完整权则否;我国立法以此构建著作人身权转让制度具必要性和可行性。
Traditional copyright theory argues that works can be seen as an extension of the authors and their personalities, and moralrights cannot be seen separately, and therefore, cannot be transferred. The provision of the moral rights transfer is lacking in Copyright Law in China. However, moral rights are transferred from time to time in the information age. There are three different theories advocating the maintenance or deconstruction of the traditional copyright theory. But the existing doctrines are unconvincing as to why the moral rights can be transferred. This article holds that the publication right and modification right can be transferred while the others cannot.
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2014年第6期73-80,96-97,共8页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"知识产权转让和许可使用法律问题研究"(12BFX103)
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"海南国际旅游岛建设所涉知识产权利用问题研究"(11YJA820045)
关键词
新媒体技术
著作人身权
转让
本土化构建
new media technology
author
moral rights
moral rights transfer
