期刊文献+

腹腔镜、胆道镜联合液电碎石在胆总管结石中的应用 被引量:6

Laparoscopy plus choledochofiberscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for biliary calculi
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜、胆道镜联合液电碎石在胆总管结石中的应用.方法 2009年1月至2013年12月应用腹腔镜、胆道镜联合液电碎石治疗173例胆道结石,其中男性102例,女性71例.年龄24~73岁,平均47.2岁.胆道结石合并胆囊结石者先行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,再通过胆道镜工作通道,应用液电碎石机治疗电极,在直视下接触结石,将胆总管及肝胆管结石击碎后用取石篮套出.结果 173例病人中,147例结石均一次性完全清除,余下病人留置T管后按疗程3~9周内清除结石.无胆管损伤、胆漏.162例术后随访3~30个月,平均15个月,腹部B超或磁共振胰胆管成像(magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography,MRCP)检查未发现结石复发及残留,无胆道狭窄.结论 腹腔镜、胆道镜联合液电碎石机治疗胆道结石具有直观、准确、方便、疗效确切的特点,是治疗胆道结石的一种安全、有效的新手段. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy by laparoscopy plus choledochofiberscopy for patients with complicated biliary calculi.Methods The clinical data of 73 patients with complicated biliary calculi undergoing laparoscopy with choledochofiberscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy from January 2009 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively.The patients with both biliary calculi and gall bladder stone underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed by electrohydraulic lithotripsy.Then the stones were fragmented and extracted by irrigation or via a basket.Results A total of 147 stones were removed in one session without injury to bile duct or biliary leakage over 3-9 weeks.The mean follow-up period was 15 (3-30) months.Re-examinations of B-ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed no recurrence,residual stones or bile duct stricture.Conclusions Electrohydraulic lithotripsy by laparoscopy plus choledochofiberscopy is safe and efficacious for complicated cholelithiasis.
出处 《腹部外科》 2014年第6期446-448,共3页 Journal of Abdominal Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 胆道镜 液电碎石 胆道结石 Laparoscopy Choledochoscopy Electrohydraulic lithotripsy Biliary calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献78

共引文献192

同被引文献59

  • 1戴德坚,陆才德,周新华,孟化.腹腔镜胆道探查临床应用分析(附340例报告)[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2004,10(2):108-110. 被引量:17
  • 2蔡秀军.腹腔镜在腹部外科应用的现状及发展方向[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(3):145-148. 被引量:67
  • 3Grubnic VV, Tkachenko AI, Ilyashenko W, et al. Laparoscopie commom bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2012,26 : 2165-2171.
  • 4Yamazaki M, Yasuda H, Tsukamoto S, et al. Primary closure of the common bile duct in open laparotomy for common bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2006,13 :398-402.
  • 5Eigeidie AA, Eishobary MM, Naeem YM. Laparoscopic explora- tion versus Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomizedtrial. Dig Surg, 2011, 28 : 424-431.
  • 6Cusehieri A, Lezoehe E, Morino M, et al. E. A. E. S. multieenter prospective randomized trial comparing two stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc, 1999,13 : 952-957.
  • 7Miura F,Takada T,Kawarada Y, et al. Flowcharts for the diag- nosisand treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2007,14: 27-34.
  • 8Decker G, Boric F, Millat B, et al. One hundred Laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc, 2003,17 : 12-18.
  • 9Arya N, Nelles SE, Haher GB, et al. Eleetrohydraulic lithotripry in 111 patients..a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stone. Am J Gastroenterol, 2004,99: 2330-2334.
  • 10戴晓江,印慨,陈丹磊,柯重伟,李际辉,郑成竹.腹腔镜下胆总管探查取石术91例[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2008,13(2):139-140. 被引量:26

引证文献6

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部