期刊文献+

条件满足下的效率差异:PPP模式与传统模式比较 被引量:69

The Efficiency Difference under the Condition Satisfying: Comparison of PPP Model and Traditional Model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从成本、质量及期限等方面入手,深入探讨PPP模式与传统模式相较的特征与优势,以回答PPP模式是否能够全面超越传统模式这一问题。从理论来看,PPP模式并不绝对优于传统模式,只有当满足一定的条件时(例如积极外部性、设施所有权归属等),选择PPP模式才会比传统模式更具效率。从实践经验看,不同的项目在成本、质量及期限等方面各具特点,PPP模式并没有在任何方面都优于传统模式,因此如何选择,需要结合公共服务的特质以及其他外部因素进行具体考量。 Through reviewing the relevant theoretical analysis and empirical research on the PPP, this article will take the matter from the cost, quality and time, making a deep analysis of the characteristics and advantages of PPP compared with the traditional mode from the perspective of literature review and therefore discussing whether PPP is the best option. We found that: from the theory aspect, the PPP mode is not absolutely superior to the traditional mode, only if a certain condition is satisfied; in practice, different projects have different characteristics in the cost, quality and time, and PPP is not totally superior to the traditional mode in any respect. Thus associating with the feature of public service, other factors as political, environmental, etc. should be considered.
出处 《改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期34-42,共9页 Reform
基金 北京市社会科学界联合会青年社科人才资助项目"老龄化会影响科技创新吗?"(批准号:2014SKL018) 国家自然科学基金委员会科学部主任基金项目"政府中期支出框架体系研究"(批准号:71350020)
关键词 PPP模式 传统融资模式 公共服务效能 PPP model traditional financing model effectiveness of public service
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Hart, Oliver. Incomplete Contracts and Public Ownership: Remarks, and An Application to Public-Private Partnerships. Economic Journal, 2003, ( 113 ) :pp.69-76.
  • 2Sadka E. Public -Private Partnerships : A Public Economics Perspective. CESifo Economic Studies, 2007, 53(3):pp. 466-490.
  • 3Martimort D., Pouyet J. To Build or Not to Build: Normative and Positive Theories of Public- Private Partnerships. International Journal of In- dustrial Organization, 2008, 26(2): pp.393-411.
  • 4刘波,龚晖晖.PPP模式与准公共品的供给——论PPP在大型体育场馆建设中的应用[J].首都体育学院学报,2009,21(2):151-154. 被引量:43
  • 5张勇,郝寿义.应用PPP融资模式促进城市基础建设发展[J].生产力研究,2004(11):56-58. 被引量:27
  • 6Engel E., Fischer R. D., Galetovic A. The E- conomics of Infrastructure Finance: Public-Pri- vate Partnerships versus Public Provision. EIB Papers, 2010, 15(1): pp.40-69.
  • 7Iossa, Elisabetta, and David Martimort. Risk Allocation and the Costs and Benefits of Public- Private Partnerships. RAND Journal Of Eco- nomics, 2012, (3):pp. 442-474.
  • 8Hoppe, Eva I., and Patrick W. Schmitz. Pub- lic-Private Partnerships versus Traditional Pro- curement: Innovation Incentives and Information Gathering. RAND Journal Of Economics, 2013, (1):pp.56-74.
  • 9Williamson, Oliver E. Transaction-Cost Eco- nomics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.in the Economics of Organisation and Bureaucra- cy, 2013, (1):pp. 226-254.
  • 10Raisbeck, Peter, Colin Duffield, and X1 Ming. Comparative Performance of PPPs and Tra. ditional Procurement in Australia. Constructio- Management & Economics, 2010, (4): pp. 345- 359.

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘志.PPP模式在公共服务领域中的应用和分析[J].建筑经济,2005,26(7):13-18. 被引量:57
  • 2黄永京,陈黎明,闫田,鞠成军.民间资本在美国体育场馆融资中的作用探析[J].山东体育学院学报,2006,22(1):38-41. 被引量:21
  • 3石岩,刘勇,蔡仲林,王健,易钦仁,盛克庆,熊伟.中外体育场馆建设投融资模式的比较研究[J].体育文化导刊,2006(10):10-12. 被引量:16
  • 4张维然,林慧军,王绥娟.延安东路隧道复线BOT模式之评价[J].中国市政工程,1996(3):48-53. 被引量:2
  • 5Wang S Q. Lessons learnt from the PPP practices in China ( keynote speech) [ A ]. Asian Infrastructure Congress 2006 [ C]. Organized by Terrapinn and sponsored by IAPF, Hong Kong, Nov 29- 30, 2006.
  • 6中华环保频道.长春汇津污水处理有限公司诉长春市人民政府案一审结案[OL].http://www.cctvep.eom/news/news1721.htm,2008-8-20.
  • 7亚洲开发银行.中国城市水业市场化(PPP)推进过程中遇到的一些重要问题及相关建议[R].亚洲开发银行技术援助项目-4095:中华人民共和国/政策调整.2005,1.
  • 8沈际勇 王守清 强茂山.中国BOT/PPP项目的政治风险和主权风险:案例分析.华商?投资与融资,2005,1:1-7.
  • 9浙商网.谁动了杭州湾跨海大桥的奶酪?[OL].http://www.zjol.com.cn/gb/node2/nodel38665/node257861/node257865/node257874/userob-ject15ai3951216.html,2005-3-2.
  • 10中金在线.投资商数亿投资血本无归[OL].http://news.stock888.net/040804/101,1317,1009454,00.shtml,2004-8-4.

共引文献580

同被引文献496

引证文献69

二级引证文献404

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部