期刊文献+

胸段食管癌IGRT中摆位误差分析 被引量:38

The analysis of setup error in image-guided radiotherapy with thoracic esophageal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 使用CBCT测量食管癌IGRT中的摆位误差,为ART开展提供基础数据.方法 使用千伏级CBCT采集23例胸段食管癌治疗前、后摆位图像,探讨配准方法、病变部位以及不同治疗时间IGRT前摆位误差变化.单因素方差分析不同治疗时间的差异.结果 骨性及灰度匹配在x、z轴测量摆位误差有显著差异.不使用CBCT下PTV在x、y、z轴向胸上段癌分别外扩6、17、6 mm,胸中段癌分别外扩4、17、6 mm,胸下段癌分别外扩11、11、4 mm.每次使用CBCT行疗前摆位误差纠正则x、y、z轴向分别外扩2、2、4 mm.不同治疗时间IGRT前摆位误差在y轴上相近(P=0.858),在x、z轴上自第5周开始IGRT前摆位误差均高于其他几周(P=0.001,P=0.000).结论 胸段食管癌IGRT中建议采用灰度配准.不同部位食管癌PTV在x、y、z轴向外扩范围应有所不同.IGRT可使PTV外放边界显著缩小.疗前期摆位误差可考虑用于指导后续治疗,治疗后期患者x、z轴向疗前摆位误差变大,建议自第5周时更换体膜进行模拟定位,重新制定治疗计划. Objective The purpose of the study was to use cone beam CT (CBCT) scans to evaluate setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy with thoracic esophageal carcinoma,in order to refer for adaptive radiotherapy.Methods CBCT scans were performed before and at the end of image-guided radiotherapy with 23 thoracic esophageal carcinoma patients.The registration method and setup error in different lesions and treatment weeks were measured.The difference of treatment time was single factor analysis of variance.Results Compared with bone registration and gray value registration,the setup errors in x and z axis have significant differences.Without CBCT,the adequate coverage margins required for the CTV in x,y and z axis with upper,middle and lower esophageal carcinoma were 6 mm,17 mm,6 mm;4 mm,17 mm,6 mm and 11 mm,11 mm 4 mm,respectively.The adequate coverage margins of the plan target volume (PTV) were 2 mm,2 mm and 4 mm in x,y and z axis if the CBCT was applied in irradiation during the image guided radiotherapy.When compared with setup errors at different weeks,no significant difference was found among them in y axis (P =0.001,0.000),but the setup errors of the fifth week in x and z axis were larger significantly than those of other weeks (P =0.858).Conclusions Gray value registration is recommended in image-guided radiotherapy with thoracic esophageal carcinoma.The adequate coverage margins are different in x,y and z axis with different lesions.The coverage margin of the PTV could be reduced significantly as CBCT are applied during the irradiation.The setup errors measured during earlier treatment period can be considered to guide subsequent irradiation.The setup errors in x and z axis become larger during the later irradiation course.Re-simulation should be recommended at the the fifth treatment week.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期70-73,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目(GL2012051)
关键词 食管肿瘤/图像引导放射疗法 摆位误差 体层摄影术 X线计算机 锥形束 Esophageal neoplasms/image guided radiotherapy Setup error Tomography, X-ray computed, cone beam
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, et al. Adaptive radiation therapy [J].Phys Med Biol,1997,42(1) :123-132.
  • 2Bijhold J, van Herk M, Vijlbrief R, et al. Fast evaluation ofpatient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal andsimulator images [ J]. Phys Med Biol, 1991,36(2) : 1665-1679.
  • 3Van HM. Errors and margins in radiotherapy [J]. Semin RadiatOncol,2004,14 (1): 52-64. DOI: 10. 1053/j. semradonc. 2003.10.003.
  • 4曲颂,朱小东,李龄,付庆国.三种配准方式下腹部肿瘤IGRT摆位误差的比较[J].肿瘤防治研究,2011,38(12):1434-1437. 被引量:13
  • 5高超,王澜,迟子锋,韩春,王军,张辛,麻国新,肖爱勤.食管癌三维适形放疗中摆位误差对剂量学影响的研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18(4):270-273. 被引量:17
  • 6Borst GR, Sonke JJ, Betgen A, et al. Kilo-voltage cone-beamcomputed tomography setup measurements for lung cancer patients :first clinical results and comparison with electronic portal-imagingdevice [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,68(2) :555-561.DOI: 10.1016/j. ijrobp. 2007. 01. 014.
  • 7Hawkins MA, Aitken A, Hansen VN, et al. Set-up errors inradiotherapy for oesophageal cancers—is electronic portal imagingor conebeam more accurate. [ J]. Radiother Oncol,2011,98(2):249-254. DOI: 10.1016/j. radonc. 2010.11.002.
  • 8Kupelian PK,Lee C,Langen KM, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance strategies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008 , 70 ( 4 ) : 1151-1157.DOI: 10.1016/j. ijrobp. 2007.07.2371.
  • 9Zeidan OA, Langen KM, Meeks SL, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance protocols in the treatment of head and neck cancers [ J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,67 (3) : 670-677. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijrobp. 2006.09.040.
  • 10Dieleman E, Senan S, Vincent A, et al. Four-dimensionalcomputed tomographic analysis of esophageal mobility during nomalrespiration [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,67(3) :775-780. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijrobp. 2006.09.054.

二级参考文献20

  • 1于金明,袁双虎.图像引导放射治疗研究及其发展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):81-83. 被引量:100
  • 2戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 3耿辉,戴建荣,李晔雄,张可,王绿化.一种简单调强放疗技术应用的初步研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(5):411-415. 被引量:58
  • 4何正中,戴建荣,乐文友.调强放疗中摆位误差对脊髓剂量的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(2):132-135. 被引量:12
  • 5Bijhold J, van Herk M, Vijlbrief R, et al. Fast evaluation of patient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal and simulator images. Phys Med Biol, 1991, 36 : 1665-1679.
  • 6Remeijer P, Geerlof E, Ploeger L, et al. 3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 46:1281-1290.
  • 7Fu W, Yang Y, Li X, et al. Dosimetric effects of patient rotation- al setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments. Phys Med Biol, 2006, 51:5321-5331.
  • 8Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging;review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol,2001,55 : 105-120.
  • 9van Asselen B, Dehnad H, Raaijmakers CP, et al. Implanted gold markers for position verification during irradiation of head-and- neck cancers:a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 59 : 1011-1017.
  • 10Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Wu Q, et al. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 63:422-433.

共引文献34

同被引文献308

引证文献38

二级引证文献205

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部