4Jeejeebhoy KN. Enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition - the risks and benefits. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007, 4: 260 - 265.
5Mekhail TM, Adelstein D J, Rybicki LA, et al. Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma. Is a percutaneous endo- scopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube.9 Cancer, 2001,91:1785 - 1790.
7Ljungdahl M, Sundbom M. Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy:a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc ,2006,20 : 1248 - 1251.
8Platt MS, Roe DC. Complications following insertion and replacement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) tubes. J Forensic Sci, 2000,45:833 - 835.
9Kirchg Atterer A, Bunte C, Asch LG. Long - term outcome following placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in younger and ol- der patients. Scand J Gastroenterol,2007 ,2 :271 -276.
10Cappell MS. Risk factors and risk reduction of malignant seeding of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy track from pharyng - oesoph- ageal malignancy : a review of all 44 known reported cases. Am J Gas- troenterol,2007,102 : 1307 - 1311.
