期刊文献+

不同消毒剂对口腔综合治疗台水路消毒效果研究 被引量:24

Disinfection efficacy of different disinfectants on dental unit waterlines
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同消毒剂对口腔综合治疗台水路(DUWLs)的消毒效果。方法将18台DUWLs随机分成4组,分别为过氧化氢消毒剂(H2O2)组、次氯酸钠消毒剂(NaClO)组、过氧化氢银离子消毒剂(Sanosil)组、蒸馏水冲洗(DW)组。采用对应消毒剂对DUWLs进行消毒,采集三用枪和高速手机水样,比较消毒前后细菌数量。结果消毒前各组细菌数量比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),各组DUWLs细菌数严重超标(均>3 000 CFU/mL)。除DW组外,消毒后各组DUWLs细菌数量大幅度下降(均<100 CFU/mL),消毒后细菌数量低于消毒前(均P<0.001)。3种消毒剂消毒后1周,不同时间各组细菌数量比较,差异有统计学意义(三用枪:Day1—Day5,均P<0.05;高速手机:Day2、Day3和Day5,均P<0.05)。消毒后第3天三用枪(H2O2组和NaClO组)、消毒后第4天高速手机(H2O2组和NaClO组)、消毒后第5天三用枪和高速手机(Sanosil组)细菌数量均超过美国疾病预防控制中心提出的口腔医疗卫生用水标准。3组消毒剂在消毒后1周细菌数量均超过或接近消毒前水平。结论 3种消毒剂均可有效降低水路中的细菌载量。与其他消毒剂相比,Sanosil在消毒后抑制细菌生长更具优势。 Objective To compare the disinfection efficacy of different disinfectants on dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). Methods 18 sets of DUWLs were randomly divided into 4 groups,and disinfected or treated with hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 )disinfectant,sodium hypochlorite (NaClO)disinfectant,hydrogen peroxide silver ion disinfectant(Sanosil),and distilled water (DW)respectively.Water specimens from triple syringes and high-speed handpieces were taken,bacterial count before and after disinfection were compared.Results Before disinfection,no significant differences in bacterial counts were found among four groups (all P 〉0.05),bacterial counts of DUWLs of all groups severely exceeded the standard(all〉3 000 CFU/mL).After disinfection,except DW group,bacterial counts of DUWLs of the other groups declined dramat-ically (all 〈100 CFU/mL),bacterial count after disinfection were all obviously lower than before disinfection (all P 〈0.001 ).One week after disinfection,bacterial counts among three disinfectant groups in different time periods were statisti-cally different (triple syringes:Day1—Day5,all P 〈0.05;high-speed handpieces:Day2,Day3 and Day5,all P 〈0.05). Day3 after disinfection of triple syringes by H2 O2 and NaClO,Day4 after disinfection of high-speed handpieces by H2 O2 and NaClO,and Day5 of triple syringes and high-speed handpieces by Sanosil all exceeded the standard of Center for Disease Control and Prevention of America.One week after disinfection,bacterial counts of three disinfection groups all exceeded or approximated to that before disinfection.Conclusion Three types of disinfectants can all effectively reduce bacterial load in DUWLs.Compared with other disinfectants,Sanosil has advantage of inhibiting bacterial growth after disinfection.
出处 《中国感染控制杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第1期23-26,共4页 Chinese Journal of Infection Control
基金 南京医科大学面上项目(2012NJMU099) 江苏省卫生厅科研项目(Q201205)
关键词 口腔科 过氧化氢银离子消毒剂 过氧化氢 含氯消毒剂 综合治疗台水路 感染控制 医院感染 department of stomatology hydrogen peroxide silver ion disinfectant hydrogen peroxide chlorine-containing disinfectant dental unit waterlines infection control healthcare-associated infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Coleman D C,O’Donnell M J,Shore A C,et al. Biofilm problems in dental unit water systems and its practical control[J].J Appl Microbiol, 2009,106(5):1424-1437.
  • 2Barbot V,Migeot V,Rodier M H,et al. Saliva promotes survival and even proliferation of Candida species in tap water[J].FEMS Microbiol Lett,2011, 324(1):17-20.
  • 3Dogruoz N,llhanSungur E,Goksay P,et al. Evaluation of microbial contamination and distribution of sulphatereducing bacteria in dental units[J].Environ Monit Assess,2012,184 (1):133-139.
  • 4Nikaeen M,Hatamzadeh M,Sabzevari Z,et al. Microbial quality of water in dental unit waterlines[J].J Res Med Sci,2009,14(5):297-300.
  • 5章小缓,凌均棨,姬亚昆,侯水平,陈守义.口腔综合治疗台水路生物膜观察与消毒干预[J].中国感染控制杂志,2011,10(1):9-14. 被引量:17
  • 6刘艳,杨启芳.口腔科综合治疗台用水管路消毒效果探讨[J].中国感染控制杂志,2010,9(6):443-444. 被引量:13
  • 7Dallolio L, Scuderi A, Rini M S, et al. Effect of different disinfection protocols on microbial and biofilm contamination of dental unit waterlines in community dental pratices[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2014,11(2):2064-2076.
  • 8Orru G,Del Nero S, Tuveri E,et al. Evaluation of antimicrobialantibiofilm activity of a hydrogen peroxide decontaminating system used in dental unit waterlines[J]. Open Dent J,2010,4:140- 146.
  • 9Puttaiah R, Seibert J, Spears R, et al. Effects of iodine in microbial control of dental treatment water[J].J Contemp Dent Pract,2011,12(3): 143-151.
  • 10Abdallah S A, Khalil A L. Impact of cleaning regimes on dental water unit contamination [J].J Water Health,2011,9(4):647-652.

二级参考文献22

  • 1李荣华,殷恺,李宏斌,冯海,郑先强,闫平,王世汶,林颂.牙科治疗台水系统无菌化处理的临床研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2004,18(5):456-459. 被引量:29
  • 2方秀娟,钱敏,石胜陵.口腔综合治疗台交叉感染相关因素分析与对策[J].中国感染控制杂志,2006,5(4):368-368. 被引量:12
  • 3Blake G C. The incidence and control of bacterial infection of dental unit and ultrasonic scaler [J]. Br Dent J, 1963,115:413.
  • 4Meiller T F,Depaola L G,Kelley J I,et al.Dental unit waterlines:biofilms,disinfection and recurrence[J].J Am Dent Assoc,1999,130(1):65-72.
  • 5Montebugnoli L,Sambfi V,Cavrini F,et al.Detection of DNA from periodontal pathogenic bacteria in biofilm obtained from waterlines in dental units[J].New Microbiol,2004,27 (4):391-397.
  • 6Walker J T,Bradshaw D J,Bennett A M,et al.Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water systerns in general dental practice[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,2000,66(8):3363-3367.
  • 7Szymanska J.Electron microscopic examination of dental unit waterlines biofilm[J].Ann Agric Environ Med,2005,12(2):295-298.
  • 8Mavridou A,Kamma J,Mandilara G,etal.Microbial risk assessment of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Greece[J].Water Sci Technol,2006,54(3):269-273.
  • 9Thumheer T,Gmur R,Guggenheim B,Multiplex FISH analysis of a six-species bacterial biofilm[J].J Microbiol Methods,2004,56(1):37-47.
  • 10Miller C H.Infection control and management of hazardous material for the dental team[J].St Louis Mosby,2005,125(9):277-297.

共引文献45

同被引文献193

引证文献24

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部