摘要
修改后的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第76条规定了一种"新"的判决方式——补救判决。早在最高人民法院2000年发布的司法解释中就初步确立了该种判决方式,但并未引起足够的重视和关注,司法实践对于该判决方式的适用也存在较大差异,这在一定程度上影响了补救判决的法律效果。因此,以人民法院裁判文书为依据,对补救判决的适用情况进行归纳分析,不仅有助于修法后补救判决的正确适用,而且对于提升法院补救判决的质量,维护司法权威,具有重要的理论和实践意义。
There is a new form of judgment, remedial judgment, which is provided by the latest Administrative Procedure Law of the PRC. This kind of judicial method has been established in the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme People＇ s Court in 2000, but this kind of judicial method has not caused enough attention. In addition, there are great differences in using this kind of judicial method in judicial practice, and this affects the legal effect of remedial judgment in a certain extent. Therefore, it will not only help the correct application of remedial judgment after the law revised, but also enhance the quality of the judgment of the court remedies and safeguard judicial authority by summarizing and analyzing the application of the remedial judgment according to the administrative judgment documents.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期234-247,共14页
China Legal Science
