基于学习进阶的教师PCK测评工具的开发研究被引量：10

The Development and Research on the Base-Learning Progressions' Teachers' PCK Evaluation Tools

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要 PCK因被认为是使教学最有效的知识而备受关注,对PCK的理论研究不断深化的同时,研究方法也不断朝着科学化、精准化的方向发展。美国密歇根州立大学教师教育学院基于学习进阶模型,采用问卷调查法,开发了一套测评教师学科教学知识的工具。从该测评工具的实践应用入手,其理论基础、框架构建以及实施程序等,都能够为我国教师PCK评价工具的开发研制提供一定的参考。 PCK is considered to be the most effective teaching knowledge. When we study on its theory,its research methods are moving toward the more precision,more scientific direction. College of Teacher Education Michigan State University based on the learning progressions,using questionnaires,developed a set of evaluation tools for teachers＇ pedagogical content knowledge. This paper studies from the application,focus on the theoretical foundation,framework to build and implement programs designed to provide a meaningful reference for the development of our teachers PCK evaluation tools.

作者皇甫倩

机构地区华中师范大学教育学院

出处《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期96-105,共10页 Studies in Foreign Education

基金中国教育部国家留学基金委资助项目"国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目"(项目编号:[2014]3026)

关键词学习进阶教师学科教学知识测评工具 Learning Progressions Pedagogical Content Knowledge evaluation tools

分类号 G451 [文化科学—教育技术学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Wilson,M..Measuring Progressions:Assessment Structures Underlying a Learning Progres-sion[J] .Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2009,46(6):716-730.
2National Research Council(NRC).Taking Science to School:Learning and Teaching Science inGrades K-8[M] .Washington:National Academies Press,2007:36.
3杨玉琴.化学学科能力及其测评研究[D] .上海:华东师范大学,2013:97.
4Shulman,L.S..Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform[J] .Harvard Educa-tion Review,1987,57(1):1-22.
5Alonzo,A.,Kobarg,M.&Seidel,T..Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher-student interactions:Analysis of two video cases[J] .Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2012,49(10):1211-1239.
6Heller,J.I.,Daehler,K.R.,Wong,N.,Shinohara,M.&Miratrix,L.W..Differential effects ofthree professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary sci-ence[J] .Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2012,49(3):333-362.
7Baxter,J.A.&Lederman,N.G..Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge[M] //J.Gess-Newsome&N.G.Lederman(Eds.).PCK and science education.Netherlands:Kluwer Ac-ademic Publishers,1999:147-161.
8Bianchini,J.A.,Yestness,N.Nilsen,K.J.,Hammond,L.M.,Kim,J.,Parker,S.D.,and Berkow-itz,A.M..Learning Progression-Based Teaching Strategies in Environmental Science:Teachers'Success-es and Struggles in Implementation[R] .Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Associationfor Research in Science Teaching,Pittsburgh,2014:152.
9Anderson,C.W.&Smith,E.L..Teaching Science[M] //V.Richardson-Koehler(Ed.).Educa-tors'handbook:A research perspective.New York,NY:Longman,1987:84-111.
10Kagan,D.M..Ways of evaluating teacher cognition:Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Prin-ciple[J] .Review of Educational Research,1990,60(3):419-469.

二级参考文献4

1Mullis,I.V.S.etc.TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks [EB/OL ] http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/.2005.
2Olson,J.F.etc.TIMSS 2007 Technical Report [EB/OL]http://limssandpirls.bc.edu/.2008.
3Olson,J.F.etc.TIMSS 2007 Released Items [EB/OL]http:// limssandpirls.bc.edu/.2009.
4Martin,M.O.ete.TIMSS 2007 science report [EB/OL ] http:// timssandpirls.bc.edu/.2008.