期刊文献+

增强PM_(2.5)脱除的新型电除尘技术的发展 被引量:121

Development of Advanced Electrostatic Precipitation Technologies for Reducing PM_(2.5) Emissions From Coal-fired Power Plants
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 静电除尘器已广泛应用于工业除尘领域,其对粗颗粒收集效率高达99.9%以上,但在PM2.5范围内存在穿透窗口,难以满足日趋严格的烟气污染物排放环保标准。文中介绍了3种发展的电除尘新技术——低低温电除尘器、湿式电除尘器和电袋除尘器,分别采用实验与理论分析的方法对3种电除尘器的脱除机理与脱除性能及在国内外燃煤电站的应用情况进行了探讨,结果表明,电除尘新技术可有效控制PM2.5的排放,达到粉尘低于20 mg/m3排放的目标,并可实现SO3酸雾及汞等重金属排放的协同控制。 The Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) has been used widely in coal-fired power plants and other industrial plants. Although the collection efficiency of ESP higher than 99.9% for coarse particles, it exhibits relatively low performance in capturing of fine particles (PM2.5), in which a penetrating window exists in the range of 0.1-1.0μm. Therefore, several technologies, including extra cold-side ESP, wet ESP and hybrid ESP/BAG device, have been developed for the efficient removal of PM2.5 to meet the increasingly strict emission standards. In this paper, the removal mechanisms and performances of these three kinds of new emerging technologies, which are all on the basis of ESP principle, were analyzed and tested by the experimental and theoretical investigations. Furthermore the comparisons on the practical applications in coal-fired power plants were discussed. The results indicate that the synergetic capture of PM2.5, SO3 acid mist and even mercury can be effectively achieved by employing the single or coupled approach of these three new technologies.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期2217-2223,共7页 Proceedings of the CSEE
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(2013CB228506) 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(863计划)(2013AA065004)~~
关键词 PM2.5 静电除尘器 低低温电除尘器 湿式电除尘器 电袋复合除尘器 PM2.5 electrostatic precipitator (ESP) low-low temperature ESP wet ESP hybrid particulate collector
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Yao Q, Li S Q, Xu H W, et al. Studies on formation and control of combustion particulate matter in China: a review[J]. ENEROY, 2009, 34(9): 1296-1309.
  • 2Vijapur S H. Design optimization and experimental study of a wet laminar electrostatic precipitator for enhancing collection efficiency of aerosols[D]. Ohio: Ohio University, 2008.
  • 3Mohr M, Ylatalo S, Klippel N, et al. Submicron fly ash penetration through electrostatic precipitators at two coal power plants[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 1996, 24(3): 191-204.
  • 4Ylatalo S, Hautanen J. Electrostatic precipitator penetration ftmction for pulverized coal combustion [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 1998, 29(1): 17-30.
  • 5尹连庆,王晶.粉尘比电阻对电除尘的影响及改进措施研究[J].电力环境保护,2009,25(5):34-37. 被引量:22
  • 6Deutsch W. Bewegung und ladung der elektrizitastrager im zylinderkondensator[J]. Annal of Physics, 1922, 373(12): 335-344.
  • 7徐毅飞.湿式静电除尘器细颗粒物迁移和逃逸特性的机理研究[D].北京:清华大学,2013.
  • 8Bayless D J, Alam M K, RadcliffR, et al. Membrane- based wet electrostatic precipitation[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005, 55(6): 784-791.
  • 9Reynolds J. Multi-pollutant control using membrane -based up-tlow wet electrostatic precipitation [R]. Westfield, N J: DOE Final Report, 2004.
  • 10Kim H J, Han B, Kim Y J, et al. Fine particle removal performance of a two-stage wet electrostatic precipitator using a nonmetallic pre-charger[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2011, 61(12): 1334-1343.

二级参考文献83

共引文献102

同被引文献1046

引证文献121

二级引证文献783

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部