摘要
目的:比较加巴喷丁联合喹硫平与单用喹硫平治疗血管性痴呆叠加谵妄的疗效与疗效指数(CGI -EI)。方法血管性痴呆叠加谵妄患者62例,随机分成治疗组(加巴喷丁联合喹硫平组,30例)和对照组(单用喹硫平组,32例),在治疗前及治疗后3、9、15天进行谵妄量表(DSS )评分,在治疗前和治疗后15天进行智能精神状态检查表(MMSE)、日常生活评定量表(ADL)及临床疗效总评量表(CGI)评分。结果治疗组与对照组治疗血管性痴呆叠加谵妄均有效,疗效指数增高。与对照组比较,治疗组的 DSS 评分在治疗后3、9、15天时明显增高,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05或 P <0.01);治疗后 MMSE 评分明显增高,CGI 严重程度评分(CGI -SI)明显降低,疗效总评(CGI -GI)明显降低,CGI -EI 明显增高,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);ADL 评分的差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论在治疗血管性痴呆叠加谵妄时,加巴喷丁联合喹硫平较单用喹硫平控制谵妄症状快,疗效和疗效指数更高,且较为安全。
Objective To compare the efficacy and efficacy index (CGI -EI) of delirium superimposed on vascular dementia using combined gabapentin and quetiapine and quetiapine alone.Methods A total of 62 patients with delirium superimposed on vascular dementia were randomly divided into a control group receiving quetiapine alone (n =32) and a treatment group given combined gabapentin and quetiapine (n =30).All patients underwent DSS assessment before and 3, 9, and 15 days after treatment.They were assessed according to MMSE, ADL and CGI scales before and 15 days after treatment.Results Both therapies could treat delirium superimposed on vascular dementia effectively, with high efficacy index.Compared with the control, the treatment group could result in remarkably increased DSS, MMSE and CGI -EI scores 3, 9 and 15 days after treatment (P 〈0.05 or P 〈0.01), in contrast with significantly decreased CGI -SI and CGI -GI scores (P 〈0.05).However, no statistical difference was seen as to ADL score between both groups (P 〈0.05).Conclusions Combined gabapentin and quetiapine when applied for delirium superimposed on vascular dementia, controls delirium related symptoms faster and produces better efficacy and higher efficacy index, which can be safely used.
出处
《徐州医学院学报》
CAS
2015年第3期155-157,共3页
Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
基金
国家自然科学基金(30870797)
关键词
加巴喷丁
喹硫平
血管性痴呆叠加谵妄
gabapentin
quetiapine
delirium superimposed on vascular dementia